!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

308 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/105 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
11 Oct 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900I think what we want is probably if [compiler explicitly declares supported] then [that] else [some set of sane defaults] - [compiler explicitly declares unsupported]11:07:08
12 Oct 2025
@anton:gersthof.comAnton (he/him) changed their display name from Anton to Anton (he/him).13:17:58
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily can we eat ~10k Ruby rebuilds on -next to fix extension modules with LLVM 21? 14:21:25
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilycould be conditioned on Darwin only for now14:21:30
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatSounds OK to me.14:46:55
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyre the whole doing periodic merges via PR thing15:55:00
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily what if we just used the merge queue to ensure that nothing goes into master or staging-next that won't cleanly merge into the branches after it? 15:55:17
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily and switched things around so that, if you would cause a merge conflict on a later branch, you instead merge it into the later branch 15:55:34
@k900:0upti.meK900That is going to completely stall some PRs15:55:39
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyand then "backport" it to the earlier ones15:55:40
@k900:0upti.meK900 I think 15:55:43
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilystall howso?15:55:51
@k900:0upti.meK900 Oh god that's going to be so painful 15:55:53
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywhy?15:55:58
@k900:0upti.meK900Because nothing will backport cleanly and then we have to check backports and oof15:56:12

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6