| 7 Oct 2025 |
 vcunat | Though I could assume that we won't have any other critical-package breaking update anymore. | 06:26:38 |
 K900 | I think we have the binutils fixes | 06:27:51 |
| K900 | That I would like someone to actually look at | 06:27:58 |
| K900 | And then we can go | 06:28:02 |
| K900 | Does anyone understand binutils | 06:29:08 |
| K900 | I assume the answer is no but can someone pretend to understand binutils for my sake | 06:29:42 |
| vcunat | Yes, sure. That shouldn't be breaking. | 06:29:51 |
| vcunat | I don't really understand binutils, to make myself clear. | 06:30:15 |
| K900 | I can't look at binutils code at 9:30AM | 06:30:50 |
| K900 | That is security and an stdenv rebuild | 06:31:00 |
| K900 | So we probably want it in this cycle | 06:31:13 |
| vcunat | Yes. | 06:31:24 |
| K900 | @qyliss:fairydust.space :eyes: | 06:32:59 |
 Alyssa Ross | I'm sick | 06:33:24 |
| K900 | :( | 06:35:37 |
| K900 | OK I guess I have to go look at binutils code at 9AM | 06:35:49 |
| vcunat | Why do you want to look at the code? | 06:41:32 |
| vcunat | BTW, there's also openssl security:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/447713 | 06:41:45 |
| vcunat | * Why do you want to look at the code? I merged it in the meantime. | 06:44:37 |
| vcunat | 3.5 -> 3.6 could be disruptive. | 06:45:20 |
| vcunat | So it's a question whether to even have 3.6 as default in 25.11. | 06:45:49 |
| K900 | Just to confirm it's the right fixes | 06:51:48 |
| vcunat | OK, I did that (details posted there). | 06:52:26 |
| K900 | The changelog looks manageable | 06:52:27 |
