!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

308 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/105 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
23 Sep 2025
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat So staging-next never knew this merge+revert. 12:49:36
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunati.e. the merge base (for master->staging-next) always seemed like master didn't change anything and staging-next updated it.12:50:29
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherAh, that was a misunderstanding on my part, then.12:50:40
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Walther I thought this was already in staging-next. 12:50:47
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherBut it was what caused the merge conflict and never made it there.12:50:55
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherAfter the revert, the state was clean again.12:51:00
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Walther(there was never a manual merge)12:51:07
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat It is in staging-next now, but there was no auto-merge on the state between merging the PR and reverting it. 12:51:58
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat * It is in staging-next now, but there was no merge on the state between merging the PR and reverting it. 12:52:10
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Waltheryes.12:52:15
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherIt only came in as merge+revert = no-op. I see.12:52:22
@k900:0upti.meK900Yeah12:52:35
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherIn any case, the update is already there, so nothing to do for me :D12:52:54
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatRarely you run into such "problems" resulting from the dumbness of 3-way merging.12:53:05
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatIf the auto-merge timing was different, it would resolve differently.12:53:21
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatOr "luckily" it wouldn't merge cleanly because of the fetcher rewrite.12:54:31
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Waltherexactly12:54:43
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatSo, when are we switching to pijul? 😆12:58:38
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián HerediaHi, for cmake 4 I want to pull a patch from sourceforge but I can't seem to find an easy way to do that and seems like other maintainers have opted to inline / commit the patch into a file in nikpkgs. wsid? https://sourceforge.net/p/panotools/libpano13/ci/698e20b4d296c1dbde9d010c3fb8d54050e56ddb/15:03:10
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián Heredia* Hi, for cmake 4 I want to pull a patch from sourceforge but I can't seem to find an easy way to do that and seems like other maintainers have opted to inline / commit the patch into a file in nikpkgs. What should I do? https://sourceforge.net/p/panotools/libpano13/ci/698e20b4d296c1dbde9d010c3fb8d54050e56ddb/15:03:21
@k900:0upti.meK900IMO just vendor it15:06:49
@k900:0upti.meK900It's three lines who gives a shit15:06:52

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6