| 22 Sep 2025 |
 Vladimír Čunát | The error doesn't happen on x86_64-linux, so that can be confusing. | 06:47:02 |
 K900 | /build/dotnet-9.0.110/eng/detect-binaries.sh: line 135: 5091 Segmentation fault /build/dotnet-9.0.110/.dotnet/dotnet run --project /build/dotnet-9.0.110/eng/tools/BinaryToolKit -c Release --property:RestoreSources=/nix/store/pir670rnvffbwf5jigw5zgm5c442z8px-dotnet-stage0-sdk-9.0.110-artifacts clean /build/dotnet-9.0.110 -o /build/dotnet-9.0.110/artifacts/log/binary-report -ab /build/dotnet-9.0.110/eng/allowed-sb-binaries.txt -l Debug -p CustomPackageVersionsProps=/nix/store/pir670rnvffbwf5jigw5zgm5c442z8px-dotnet-stage0-sdk-9.0.110-artifacts/PackageVersions.props
| 07:01:53 |
| K900 | So uhhh | 07:01:55 |
| K900 | Maybe we pin LLVM 20 lol | 07:01:59 |
| K900 | I'm going to try building it with LLVM 20 pinned | 07:11:56 |
| K900 | Well at least it doesn't just immediately segfault this time | 07:48:35 |
| K900 | OK yeah it definitely does not segfault on 20 | 08:10:26 |
| K900 | So does anyone want to figure this out | 08:18:20 |
| K900 | Or should I just send it | 08:18:23 |
| K900 | Because it definitely works on 20 | 08:18:28 |
| K900 | And it definitely doesn't on 21 | 08:18:31 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I'd say you send it. That won't prevent anyone from fixing it at any point in the future. | 08:22:16 |
| K900 | I'm going to let it finish building EVERYTHING just to be super sure | 08:23:15 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | Oh hey, libreoffice built on top of my libxml branch! Surprising! | 08:26:42 |
| K900 | So does anyone want to rubber stamp https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445006 before emily wakes up | 08:28:37 |
| K900 | OK I am now officially running staging-next | 10:24:12 |
| K900 | And nothing seems to have exploded | 10:24:16 |
 Wolfgang Walther | I'm getting pinged for "is staging-next OK", we really need that @NixOS/staging team...
Can someone look at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445296 ?
| 19:10:16 |
| K900 | It's just the test driver | 19:12:42 |
| K900 | So definitely OK | 19:12:46 |
| K900 | Technically kernel-next but we don't have that yet do we | 19:12:52 |
| Wolfgang Walther | I like kernel-next. I wonder what emily and ma27 say to that instead of this-branch-will-be-batched-with-kernel-updates. | 19:16:38 |
 emily | it's not really anything like staging-next is it? but I'm checked out of the bikeshed discussion at this point :) | 19:25:08 |
| Wolfgang Walther | :D I don't care, the PRs with a branch name is already up, so all good. | 19:32:25 |
| Wolfgang Walther | * :D I don't care, the PRs with a branch name are already up, so all good. | 19:32:32 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | emily: i am seeing obscure failures with nixd failing to find llvm via cmake. Considering i know nothing about llvm, i'll be deferring this one. Maybe you have an idea... | 19:48:08 |
| emily | LLVM 21 issue? | 19:49:07 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | maybe | 19:50:13 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | but also maybe cmake | 19:50:18 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | its looking for llvm-config and not finding it | 19:50:34 |
