| 21 Sep 2025 |
 hexa | restarted | 15:59:34 |
 emily | looks like onlyLib is only relevant for lvm2 for onlyLib ? stdenv.hostPlatform.isStatic, | 16:00:34 |
| emily | I don't think that's going to make a substantial difference in rebuilds | 16:00:44 |
 Lun | rebuild count somehow is 10240 with only the script move | 16:01:30 |
| Lun | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/17895805634?pr=445004 | 16:01:31 |
| Lun | version update costs -2 rebuilds ??? | 16:02:22 |
 K900 | OK then send it I guess | 16:02:26 |
| K900 | OK I've started dumping my fixes to https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445006 | 16:22:27 |
| K900 | @emily have you found the right dotnet yet | 16:47:09 |
| emily | I didn't look | 16:54:03 |
| K900 | OK | 16:57:15 |
| K900 | I might look once I'm out of other things | 16:57:21 |
| Lun | Two CMake 4 fixes for staging-next https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445015 | 18:05:53 |
| K900 | yajl we probably want to vendor and also switch to the containers fork | 18:11:51 |
| K900 | And libuvc same actually because PR commits can disappear randomly | 18:13:00 |
| Lun | We're already on the containers fork, I just put up that PR | 18:13:01 |
| K900 | Oh but we're not on latest containers fork | 18:13:54 |
| K900 | Are we | 18:13:55 |
| K900 | For libuvc maybe just slap it with a --replace-fail tbh | 18:14:15 |
| K900 | Instead of fetching an unstable patch | 18:14:20 |
| Lun | Do you want me to bump to latest rev of the containers fork along with vendoring the PR? | 18:15:08 |
| K900 | I would do it personally because the changes look relevant | 18:15:49 |
| K900 | Or rather | 18:15:56 |
| K900 | Useful I guess | 18:15:57 |
| Lun | wait we're on the latest sha already | 18:16:24 |
| K900 | Huh | 18:16:32 |
| K900 | OK | 18:16:32 |
| K900 | I thought that date was weird | 18:16:37 |
| Lun | Patch vendored / swapped to substitute | 18:22:26 |
| K900 | Thanks, sending it | 18:24:04 |
