| 21 Sep 2025 |
emily | anyway, which derivation exactly is it that fails? | 15:00:27 |
emily | I can prepare a commit | 15:00:30 |
emily | but I always get lost in that packaging | 15:00:34 |
K900 | Uhh | 15:00:51 |
K900 | It's one of them | 15:00:52 |
K900 | I have to run it again to tell you exactly which one | 15:01:01 |
K900 | But I'm guessing it'll be all of them tbh | 15:01:05 |
emily | well, only one of them has the runtime. | 15:05:48 |
emily | the question is where the patch has to go. | 15:05:52 |
emily | can't you just re-run it and the first build that starts to run is the one that will fail, or? | 15:06:03 |
K900 | dotnet-stage0-vmr definitely fails | 15:07:41 |
K900 | OK I think it's time to play squish the cmake 4 regression | 15:14:39 |
K900 | First victim: openobex | 15:14:44 |
K900 | https://gitlab.com/openobex/mainline | 15:15:42 |
K900 | Hoo boy it's a dead upstream party | 15:23:04 |
K900 | OK lvm2 just grew a new scirpt | 15:27:18 |
K900 | * OK lvm2 just grew a new script | 15:27:19 |
K900 | Moving it out with the rest of them restores the bashlessness | 15:27:27 |
Lun | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/444998 | 15:33:51 |
K900 | Can we just have the lvmpersist change | 15:43:59 |
K900 | Updating the version will rebuild most things | 15:44:05 |
K900 | Also I made the same change on a branch I haven't pushed yet | 15:44:21 |
Lun | should I just close it then? | 15:44:54 |
Lun | isn't rebuild count the same either way from postPatch vs postPatch diff + version bump | 15:45:57 |
emily | (I don't understand what K900 means either) | 15:51:55 |
K900 | No, because it's conditional on !isLib | 15:52:15 |
K900 | Or whatever the fuck | 15:52:18 |
emily | ah | 15:52:49 |
Lun | Don't see anything setting that false from grepping | 15:53:01 |
emily | it's 10238 rebuilds on Lun's PR? | 15:53:02 |