| 21 Sep 2025 |
emily | right. which would be better, I think | 13:20:09 |
emily | since i686 is only there as a rump set of packages to use on 64-bit systems | 13:20:30 |
emily | there are no 32-bit-specific docs or shell scripts you would care about | 13:20:50 |
K900 | Yay 32-bit rustc | 13:27:57 |
K900 | Fun | 13:28:06 |
K900 | Oh great | 13:32:09 |
K900 | lvm2 is now failing with disallowed bash reference | 13:32:16 |
hexa | ^ | 13:36:04 |
K900 | Fun | 13:39:24 |
emily | I'm tired but can try to look at regressions in a few hours. | 14:06:56 |
emily | not sure building my systems will be much use | 14:07:10 |
emily | since I already built Darwin configs earlier | 14:07:16 |
ghpzin | llvm_18 is not getting dropped any time soon, right ? | 14:08:32 |
K900 | I just want to get as much as possible built first | 14:08:40 |
K900 | And then start looking at the failures | 14:08:55 |
emily | I plan to drop it in 26.05. | 14:11:02 |
emily | why? | 14:11:08 |
ghpzin | Noticed it would need patches for gcc15 | 14:11:26 |
emily | I guess the question is whether we GCC 15 or drop LLVM 18 first 😅 | 14:11:57 |
emily | depends on whether we do it this release, which Fabián Heredia seemed to lean against | 14:12:04 |
K900 | Uhh | 14:12:29 |
emily | (I'm in favour of doing it personally but admittedly this cycle might be enough hell for several months) | 14:12:26 |
K900 | Postgres JIT is busted | 14:12:32 |
K900 | By LLVM 21 I think | 14:12:34 |
emily | cc Wolfgang Walther | 14:12:50 |
Wolfgang Walther | I remember reading something about that upstream, lemme check. | 14:12:56 |
Wolfgang Walther | https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/d25e6e4a-d1b4-84d3-2f8a-6c45b975f53d%40applied-asynchrony.com
Haven't fully read through that, yet. There are some patches there. | 14:15:27 |
Wolfgang Walther | Might be better to not use LLVM 21 until the next minor releases here. | 14:16:26 |
K900 | Yeah I don't think we should risk it | 14:16:37 |
K900 | That thread looks very wacky | 14:16:55 |