| 21 Sep 2025 |
emily | wait I thought we didn't depend on GHC on i686 | 13:15:05 |
K900 | Who's we | 13:15:16 |
emily | IIRC it wasn't cached when I checked | 13:15:17 |
emily | Nixpkgs | 13:15:22 |
K900 | Well I'm building a pandoc | 13:15:32 |
K900 | So that's not true | 13:15:38 |
K900 | Maybe on Darwin | 13:15:44 |
Wolfgang Walther | Which version of GHC did you check, emily? | 13:15:58 |
Wolfgang Walther | It could only be the default version that is cached. | 13:16:05 |
emily | no this was Linux. (i686-darwin is not a thing) | 13:16:07 |
emily | pkgsi686Linux{,.buildPackages}.ghc IIRX | 13:16:50 |
emily | perhaps I do not recall xorrectly | 13:17:14 |
Wolfgang Walther | That seems cached for me (I don't think I ever built this on master) | 13:17:14 |
emily | okay well that's useful/depressing information | 13:17:34 |
Wolfgang Walther | % nix-build -A pkgsi686Linux.ghc
/nix/store/0bd49qs1cy7qgdhsg24gbj4y2v4zdg7l-ghc-9.6.7
The PR we were discussing was about 9.8.4 and 9.10.x
| 13:17:41 |
Wolfgang Walther | Still, I think pandoc is mostly set up as "if available to bootstrap from, then do it" | 13:18:21 |
Wolfgang Walther | So it could very well be, that we could still remove i686-linux GHC without actually breaking stuff, except not building some docs anymore for that platform. | 13:18:50 |
emily | right. which would be better, I think | 13:20:09 |
emily | since i686 is only there as a rump set of packages to use on 64-bit systems | 13:20:30 |
emily | there are no 32-bit-specific docs or shell scripts you would care about | 13:20:50 |
K900 | Yay 32-bit rustc | 13:27:57 |
K900 | Fun | 13:28:06 |
K900 | Oh great | 13:32:09 |
K900 | lvm2 is now failing with disallowed bash reference | 13:32:16 |
hexa | ^ | 13:36:04 |
K900 | Fun | 13:39:24 |
emily | I'm tired but can try to look at regressions in a few hours. | 14:06:56 |
emily | not sure building my systems will be much use | 14:07:10 |
emily | since I already built Darwin configs earlier | 14:07:16 |
ghpzin | llvm_18 is not getting dropped any time soon, right ? | 14:08:32 |