!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

317 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen109 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
21 Sep 2025
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyso switching seems good13:11:46
@k900:0upti.meK900If you want to snipe me to it, feel free13:12:04
@k900:0upti.meK900I'm just waiting for my big pile of i686 to complete13:12:16
@k900:0upti.meK900So I can then triage whatever fell out13:12:34
@k900:0upti.meK900(34 errors so far)13:12:39
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythis confuses me - I'm pretty sure I built toml11? 🤔13:12:47
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywait I thought we didn't depend on GHC on i68613:15:05
@k900:0upti.meK900Who's we13:15:16
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyIIRC it wasn't cached when I checked13:15:17
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyNixpkgs13:15:22
@k900:0upti.meK900Well I'm building a pandoc13:15:32
@k900:0upti.meK900So that's not true13:15:38
@k900:0upti.meK900Maybe on Darwin13:15:44
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherWhich version of GHC did you check, emily?13:15:58
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherIt could only be the default version that is cached.13:16:05
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyno this was Linux. (i686-darwin is not a thing)13:16:07
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily pkgsi686Linux{,.buildPackages}.ghc IIRX 13:16:50
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyperhaps I do not recall xorrectly13:17:14
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherThat seems cached for me (I don't think I ever built this on master)13:17:14
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyokay well that's useful/depressing information13:17:34
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Walther
% nix-build -A pkgsi686Linux.ghc
/nix/store/0bd49qs1cy7qgdhsg24gbj4y2v4zdg7l-ghc-9.6.7

The PR we were discussing was about 9.8.4 and 9.10.x

13:17:41
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherStill, I think pandoc is mostly set up as "if available to bootstrap from, then do it"13:18:21
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherSo it could very well be, that we could still remove i686-linux GHC without actually breaking stuff, except not building some docs anymore for that platform.13:18:50
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyright. which would be better, I think13:20:09
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilysince i686 is only there as a rump set of packages to use on 64-bit systems13:20:30
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythere are no 32-bit-specific docs or shell scripts you would care about13:20:50
@k900:0upti.meK900Yay 32-bit rustc13:27:57
@k900:0upti.meK900Fun13:28:06
@k900:0upti.meK900Oh great13:32:09
@k900:0upti.meK900lvm2 is now failing with disallowed bash reference13:32:16

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6