| 21 Sep 2025 |
 K900 | If it comes to that | 05:46:42 |
 Vladimír Čunát | These packages are all huge rebuilds. | 05:46:48 |
 ElvishJerricco | Right well my question is: Is the next cycle allowed to contain changes to systemd if it won't be merged to master until after 2025-10-04? | 05:47:36 |
| Vladimír Čunát | The date is about merges to staging. | 05:48:00 |
| ElvishJerricco | ahh | 05:48:04 |
| Vladimír Čunát | And 2025-10-04 looks like about exactly when the next staging-next will start. | 05:48:23 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * And 2025-10-04 looks like about exactly when the next staging-next might start. | 05:48:33 |
| ElvishJerricco | Ok, so 2025-10-04 is my deadline for this stuff; which is further out than I was planning on taking. | 05:48:51 |
| ElvishJerricco | so I should be all good pretty easily | 05:49:05 |
| Vladimír Čunát | It's certainly good that disruptive changes get merged at least a few weeks before the stable release. | 05:49:49 |
| ElvishJerricco | Yea I had intended to have initrd by default done like a month ago but time got away from me :/ | 05:50:21 |
| K900 | I'm building staging-next locally | 07:38:58 |
| K900 | Since I've got cycles to burn | 07:39:10 |
| K900 | Pushed a fix for dht | 08:08:00 |
| K900 | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-unstable/pkgs/by-name/ya/yajl/package.nix#L31 | 08:13:39 |
| K900 | Yay 10 year old JSON parser | 08:13:44 |
| K900 | Very barely more alive fork at https://github.com/containers/yajl | 08:15:42 |
| K900 | @emily thoughts? | 08:17:57 |
| K900 | (I know you enjoy these kinds of things) | 08:18:30 |
| K900 | The funny thing is, the fork doesn't even change | 08:23:48 |
| K900 | * The funny thing is, the fork doesn't even change the cmake version | 08:23:51 |
| K900 | But it does have other fixes we probably want | 08:23:58 |
| ElvishJerricco | actually, I guess I could PR the patch that systemd initrd needs right now if that means we can get it in staging-next today, which would let me finish off systemd-initrd-by-default over the next days. Does that work? | 08:25:32 |
| K900 | I think we should hold off | 08:25:50 |
| K900 | This cycle is already very cursed | 08:25:56 |
| ElvishJerricco | ah alright | 08:26:01 |
| K900 | We have cmake 4 and LLVM 2 | 08:26:08 |
| K900 | * We have cmake 4 and LLVM 21 | 08:26:09 |
| K900 | I would REALLY like to not add a systemd update into the mix | 08:26:24 |
| ElvishJerricco | the benefit of doing it this cycle is just that systemd initrd would benefit from more people using it sooner before release, but it's not that big a deal | 08:26:37 |
