!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

318 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen109 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
21 Sep 2025
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátThough the timing is rather uncertain, given by the changes we have in it now.05:44:02
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco(I mean I might find a way to workaround that but the patch is really the right solution)05:44:03
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* Though the timing is rather uncertain, given by the changes that we have in it now.05:44:16
@k900:0upti.meK900 Then next cycle yeah 05:44:22
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát2025-10-04 restrict "release-critical packages"05:45:26
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(e.g. systemd)05:45:35
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoright :/05:45:41
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccohow does that interact with staging?05:45:52
@k900:0upti.meK900 I think we can overrule that tbh 05:46:38
@k900:0upti.meK900 If it comes to that 05:46:42
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátThese packages are all huge rebuilds.05:46:48
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoRight well my question is: Is the next cycle allowed to contain changes to systemd if it won't be merged to master until after 2025-10-04?05:47:36
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátThe date is about merges to staging.05:48:00
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoahh05:48:04
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát And 2025-10-04 looks like about exactly when the next staging-next will start. 05:48:23
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * And 2025-10-04 looks like about exactly when the next staging-next might start. 05:48:33
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoOk, so 2025-10-04 is my deadline for this stuff; which is further out than I was planning on taking.05:48:51
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoso I should be all good pretty easily05:49:05
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátIt's certainly good that disruptive changes get merged at least a few weeks before the stable release.05:49:49
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoYea I had intended to have initrd by default done like a month ago but time got away from me :/05:50:21
@k900:0upti.meK900 I'm building staging-next locally 07:38:58
@k900:0upti.meK900 Since I've got cycles to burn 07:39:10
@k900:0upti.meK900 Pushed a fix for dht 08:08:00
@k900:0upti.meK900https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-unstable/pkgs/by-name/ya/yajl/package.nix#L3108:13:39
@k900:0upti.meK900Yay 10 year old JSON parser08:13:44
@k900:0upti.meK900Very barely more alive fork at https://github.com/containers/yajl08:15:42
@k900:0upti.meK900 @emily thoughts? 08:17:57
@k900:0upti.meK900(I know you enjoy these kinds of things)08:18:30
@k900:0upti.meK900The funny thing is, the fork doesn't even change08:23:48
@k900:0upti.meK900* The funny thing is, the fork doesn't even change the cmake version08:23:51

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6