!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

308 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/105 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Nov 2025
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Waltherfyi: I had already merged https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/460645 into staging-next, assuming the only question would be around the PR currently targeting master.12:37:51
@hexa:lossy.networkhexanot a problem12:39:14
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherIs anybody working on fixing that / aware of the problem already? I posted it in the haskell channel as a starter.12:48:15
@ivy:faggot.shivyit looks like very odd error12:49:18
@ivy:faggot.shivylike it’s failing to link its own compiled haskell modules12:49:42
@ivy:faggot.shivybecause the symbols its looking for are internal it seems12:50:25
@ivy:faggot.shivyunless someone forgot to expose a c output or c import right12:51:00
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Walther That doesn't look like loading haskell modules to me: dlopen(/nix/store/anfq16cq9qki033324cl26w80ngn0ska-nix-2.28.5/lib/libnixexpr.dylib, 0x0005): Symbol not found: 12:51:59
@xokdvium:matrix.orgSergei Zimmerman (xokdvium)
In reply to @wolfgangwalther:matrix.org
That doesn't look like loading haskell modules to me: dlopen(/nix/store/anfq16cq9qki033324cl26w80ngn0ska-nix-2.28.5/lib/libnixexpr.dylib, 0x0005): Symbol not found:
Oh, it’s Darwin libc++ bananza?
12:53:17
@winston:winston.shwinston it builds successfully when the grpc dependency is overridden to use the same version of protobuf, i.e. grpc.override { protobuf = protobuf_31; } πŸ€” 12:54:27
@winston:winston.shwinstonprotobuf_33 came from there12:54:42
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatO13:13:38
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat* I'm not aware.13:13:44
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatI just mentioned Domen, as the maintainer. (who has business built around cachix, I think)13:14:25
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)why do we make peoples for-profit business stuff channel blockers anyways? If they want it, they need to get their crap together themselves. Unless they pay us, i see no good reason to carry their stuff and make it slow down the rest of the ecosystem13:35:24
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatAs long as they fix it fast, etc. I don't mind. (and this case seems reasonable to me)13:40:19
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat I rather have issues with blockers that have no .meta.maintainers. 13:40:35
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatBecause... what do I do with them? Like, fix them myself always?13:40:48
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Walther Well, that for-profit stuff also provides free caching for open source projects. And Nixpkgs CI is using it as well - it even does on darwin runners for the build jobs. 13:40:54
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherSo with the state outlined above, what's the conclusion to draw? PR is ready now. Merge to master or re-target?14:44:01
@hexa:lossy.networkhexadepends on how quick staging-next lands, because then unstable evals will get cancelled14:44:42
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI'd say staging-next is probably the safe choice right now14:45:07
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherOK, will do.14:45:16
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaexcept14:45:22
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaunstable-small could benefit early πŸ˜„ 14:45:30
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* unstable-small could benefit early if merged to master πŸ˜„ 14:45:34
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccooh sick I'm in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libcap/libcap.git/commit/?id=d628b3bfe40338d4efff6b0ae50f250a0eb884c714:47:17
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Walther You tell me! I don't really care about how fast down to the day this is, as long as it doesn't land in the next staging-next cycle ;) 14:49:03
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)We also seem to have some regressions in sdl2. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/460677 fixes those. So far only dwarf-fortress and pygame is affected (and pygame has a fix already). This is an ffmpeg rebuild and impact currently seems low-ish, so i voted to drag this through the next cycle instead of throwing away already-built ffmpeg on -next. Just a heads-up.14:51:08
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)* We also seem to have some regressions in sdl2. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/460677 fixes those. So far only dwarf-fortress and pygame is affected (and pygame has a fix already). This is an ffmpeg rebuild and impact currently seems low-ish (ffplay still works), so i voted to drag this through the next cycle instead of throwing away already-built ffmpeg on -next. Just a heads-up.14:51:29

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6