!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

318 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen109 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
20 Sep 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900Went through the backlog a bit deeper09:45:28
@k900:0upti.meK900And merged a few things that seemed safe09:45:35
@k900:0upti.meK900If anyone has more, throw it at me please09:45:43
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)i have stuff to do today, but i can try to look into libxml 2.15, needs doing before 25.1109:46:31
@k900:0upti.meK900Yeah I don't think that's a this cycle kind of thing09:46:49
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)yeah no i don't think so either09:47:04
@k900:0upti.meK900All I've been merging is patch level bumps09:47:06
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)but i'll try to do a PR and do some preliminary testing for libxml 2.15, i'd appreciate if you could throw big computer at it and build up to libreoffice once i do open that PR09:47:40
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)(LO has tests that cover most of libxml)09:48:01
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherWe'd like to merge haskell-updates for this cycle. We just need to double check & merge the list of newly broken packages in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/444422. When will staging-next be created?09:55:10
@k900:0upti.meK900Probably tonight or tomorrow09:55:57
@k900:0upti.meK900Depending on how the queue runner decides to behave09:56:09
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Waltherok, cool.09:57:06
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)fuck, libxml2 is now documented via xslt/doxygen10:03:11
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)thats a fun cyclic dep...10:03:16
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)what the hell man...10:03:21
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunátlibxml2 doesn't need docs in the main derivation.10:03:42
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) --without-doc i guess... 10:03:40
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)sure, but it'd still be cyclic even if split into its own output10:04:26
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) i mean i guess i could do passthru.doc = stdenvNoCC.mkDerivation { ... }; 10:05:04
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)and "fake" the output10:05:12
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)but tbh i'll just disable it for now10:05:26
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)worse is the fact it wants doxygen even to just enable --with-python10:08:40
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)so thats "fun"10:08:45
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)i guess i'll have to add a libxml2Minimal or something10:14:05
@k900:0upti.meK900Yay more bootstrap fun10:14:44
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross
In reply to @grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.de
worse is the fact it wants doxygen even to just enable --with-python
sounds fixable?
10:16:51
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) i'd have to disable the python module build by default, and force it enabled in python-packages.nix 10:17:29
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)which is doable, but ugh10:17:37
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát Main derivation. I'm not talking about outputs. 10:17:42

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6