!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

315 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/108 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
19 Sep 2025
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI'm going to leave the hook PR up until it's closer to last-minute15:46:07
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyin the hopes that someone will look15:46:11
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilybut the bump I am merging15:46:22
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)do we want to do libaom (https://matrix.to/#/!ATURSDtpSAgOTfvtbq:lossy.network/$xBb0DQgEgSTl-2rumQQPXC_QmgmbhOW2bOv3Fdm6t-Y?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=stratum0.org) before starting this cycle? I have not looked at it yet at all15:48:44
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyhas anyone actually done a bump PR that builds?15:49:07
@k900:0upti.meK900Bump PR of what?15:50:05
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)not yet i believe15:50:05
@k900:0upti.meK900libaom?15:50:07
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)ye15:50:10
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)same for libxml2.15.015:50:59
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)that i can maybe take a look at15:51:12
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)(but i won't deal with the backports for now...)15:51:30
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)i am just a bit iffy on libxml. Its security, but it'll also make the cycle A LOT more painful15:52:16
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)image.png
Download image.png
15:52:29
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)like look, i am scared15:52:33
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)and there is more in "Major changes"15:52:58
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)if the changelog doesn't even bother listing out what exactly changed, too much has changed for this to be any fun15:53:59
@k900:0upti.meK900Can we please not have it in this cycle15:54:58
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)imo we should do 2.14.6 (it does the security fixes) but skip 2.15.0 for this cycle15:55:53
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)that should be relatively simple and not break too bad15:56:02
@k900:0upti.meK900I really want this cycle to not have anything else15:56:09
@k900:0upti.meK900But security fixes are fine I guess15:56:13
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/444384 there, thats about all i have the spoons for today. Building lxml and libxslt, if those pass i call it good and merge. 2.15.0 will have to go next cycle16:05:27
@k900:0upti.meK900I'm running kernel test16:07:34
@k900:0upti.meK900On stolen forkos hardware16:07:38
@k900:0upti.meK900So please wait for that16:07:44
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátWhy not 2.14.6 for now?16:16:17
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(it does have two security fixes in it)16:16:32
@k900:0upti.meK900That is 2.14.6?16:16:43
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátOh, right 🤦16:17:00

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6