| 18 Sep 2025 |
 K900 | Pls no | 20:49:46 |
| K900 | This cycle is already cursed like five different ways | 20:49:56 |
| K900 | We can't also have GCC 15 | 20:50:00 |
 emily | I mean | 20:50:05 |
| emily | that report says GCC 15 | 20:50:07 |
| K900 | Look at the patch | 20:50:22 |
| K900 | It's UB as fuck | 20:50:24 |
| K900 | I don't know what specifically changed but that code has only ever worked by accident | 20:50:48 |
| emily | oh wow ok | 20:51:20 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | we should add systemd 258 and gcc 15! | 20:51:21 |
| K900 | And I don't care enough about GNU screen to figure out what exactly broke it | 20:51:29 |
| K900 | That was my reaction too | 20:51:39 |
| emily | K900: from what I can see, mariadb_114 has the fix too. and a year of extra life vs. mariadb_118. I'm going to do the -D conditional on <11 and ping maintainers about bumping the default to either 114 or 118 | 22:53:53 |
 Lun | metis bump PR should be ready to merge | 22:57:53 |
| emily | cool | 22:58:18 |
| emily | do you feel like building some MariaDBs since you have Linux bootstrapped? 😆 | 22:58:31 |
| Lun | sure, PR to review run? | 22:59:04 |
| emily | trying to see if I can reproduce the failure on Darwin but I'm pretty sure I couldn't last time | 22:59:09 |
| Lun | might fill up / again lol | 22:59:19 |
| emily | will put it up soon | 22:59:25 |
| emily | though knowing whether mariadb_114 builds would be helpful too | 23:00:03 |
| emily | since I think K900 only validated 118 definitely doesn't need a patch | 23:00:11 |
| emily | it seems like the CMake changes are in that one though, so I assume it will | 23:00:18 |
| emily | not sure if the .clients need it iether | 23:00:38 |
| emily | * not sure if the .clients need it either | 23:00:40 |
| Lun | mariadb_114 builds on your cmake4 merge | 23:08:12 |
| emily | cool | 23:08:30 |
| emily | does mariadb.client? (the default version) | 23:08:35 |
| emily | or I guess mariadb_106.client is a more useful test maybe | 23:08:50 |
| Lun | both built | 23:10:20 |
