!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

317 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen109 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
3 Nov 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900 staging-next has more things than master 12:17:49
@k900:0upti.meK900And master is automatically merged into it every few hours12:17:56
@k900:0upti.meK900In this case, https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/1e1cef625b2108f3d3cab7fb6daff2fe6223324312:18:31
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)Its a conflict between https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/89fd9025cfae7cab49ea36134640952ad553c4fa and https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/1e1cef625b2108f3d3cab7fb6daff2fe6223324312:18:35
@stepbrobd:matrix.orgStepBroBD "data race" i guess
the easiest way would be me reverting and re-create the same pr after staging-next workflow?
12:18:39
@k900:0upti.meK900No12:18:45
@k900:0upti.meK900The easiest way is to tell me how to resolve the conflict and I'll do it manually and push12:19:02
@stepbrobd:matrix.orgStepBroBD keep ocamlformat 0.28 12:20:08
@stepbrobd:matrix.orgStepBroBD should be that ez 12:20:15
@k900:0upti.meK900It's not the version that's conflicting12:20:26
@k900:0upti.meK900 ^ 12:20:31
@k900:0upti.meK900 I think the correct resolution is to move the newly added version check down to meta.broken as Jo did in their big commit 12:21:02
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)Can't we just cherry-pick https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/89fd9025cfae7cab49ea36134640952ad553c4fa to staging-next individually and then accept the staging-next version explicitly for the conflicting files?12:21:04
@k900:0upti.meK900And the rest already applies cleanly12:21:47
@k900:0upti.meK900https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/89fd9025cfae7cab49ea36134640952ad553c4fa#diff-87747fec8c7dfe5d924b47da9425f32fdc332203161b00ff7f754389d86b66be is the only change that doesn't12:22:06
@stepbrobd:matrix.orgStepBroBD problem solved? 12:22:23
@stepbrobd:matrix.orgStepBroBD scared me for a bit 12:22:30
@k900:0upti.meK900Well the problem will be solved if you agree this is the correct thing to do12:22:49
@k900:0upti.meK900And then I can just commit and push it12:22:54
@stepbrobd:matrix.orgStepBroBD yes 12:23:01
@k900:0upti.meK900OK cool12:23:05
@k900:0upti.meK900Thanks12:23:05
@stepbrobd:matrix.orgStepBroBD thank you for your service 12:23:16
@stepbrobd:matrix.orgStepBroBD hope i dont mess up again 12:23:22
@k900:0upti.meK900Again you did not mess up12:23:30
@k900:0upti.meK900This is normal staging process12:23:35
@stepbrobd:matrix.orgStepBroBD first time joining staging workflow
i'll keep lurk around here 👀
12:24:20
@k900:0upti.meK900 @Wolfgang Walther had some ideas in mind to reorganize the process so that there's no manual conflict resolution involved on our part 12:24:25
@k900:0upti.meK900And instead you have to submit another PR to staging branches with the conflicts resolved correctly12:24:42
@mtvkxsw9tngk:matrix.orgmtvkxsw9tngk joined the room.12:24:43

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6