| 21 Apr 2026 |
 dramforever | yes tbc i meant "if you still want it reverted" | 00:30:28 |
 Vladimír Čunát | Just a couple days, hopefully. | 06:01:12 |
|  BPub changed their profile picture. | 14:10:23 |
 eveeifyeve | Alyssa Ross: I can't find anything that is broken in staging-next for https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/511329. Is all of the issues fixed? | 22:16:20 |
| eveeifyeve | Oh nvm your link linked me to the wrong nix-review problematic deps. | 22:18:56 |
| 22 Apr 2026 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I think we can merge staging-next today. There certainly are some leftover regressions, but not that many in total and I've noticed nothing critical. (saw gimp2, lomiri, qt6Packages.qtwebengine on darwin, appstream and others) | 06:55:04 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Except... does anyone understand this failure? https://hydra.nixos.org/build/326761030 | 07:13:07 |
| Vladimír Čunát | It reproduces on Hydra, but I did not reproduce it in a local release-checks build. | 07:13:29 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Apparently it regressed during the past two days. | 07:14:32 |
 K900 | It's too late for a Pipewire bump, isn't it | 09:22:13 |
| Vladimír Čunát | We have basically all binaries now. | 09:49:57 |
| K900 | Yeah | 09:51:15 |
| K900 | It's not horribly critical at least | 09:51:41 |
| K900 | OK, to staging it goes | 10:01:47 |
 emily | @reckenrode:matrix.org | 11:01:04 |
 Randy Eckenrode | I will have a very brief time this morning to look at it and then lunch. This is my no-rebuild hack. How did it pass the eval check if it now fails to eval? | 11:06:39 |
| emily | it's only failing on x86_64-darwin | 11:09:03 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Okay, but it evals for me on x86_64-darwin, and it evaled in the CI action. | 11:12:39 |
| Randy Eckenrode | That’s the weird part. | 11:12:43 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Oh right, it's broken on master already, not staging-next
https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/unstable/release-checks/all | 11:13:06 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * Oh right, it's broken on master already, not just staging-next
https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/unstable/release-checks/all | 11:13:22 |
| Randy Eckenrode | x86_64-darwin evals for me on staging-next. | 11:14:08 |
| emily | perhaps it's a Nix version thing(???) | 11:14:20 |
| Randy Eckenrode | I’m using Lix, but shouldn’t CI be using whatever the default Nix is? | 11:15:53 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Are release checks always run from Linux? | 11:16:23 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Yes. | 11:18:18 |
| Vladimír Čunát | It does look like an impure problem. | 11:18:40 |
| Randy Eckenrode | The release check also succeeds locally for x86_64-darwin. I’ll try it from Linux next. | 11:20:48 |
| Randy Eckenrode | It also evals on Linux …. | 11:26:57 |
 Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | k, looking | 11:36:13 |
