| 21 Oct 2025 |
 K900 | @SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) any ideas what THIS is | 08:15:24 |
 Wolfgang Walther | Will fix this. | 08:16:02 |
 Vladimír Čunát | It reads OK in English, but I fail to see the point of such code. | 08:16:45 |
| K900 | This makes no sense because qt6.full is just a buildEnv with all of those modules | 08:17:04 |
| K900 | (and should be deleted the fuck out of nixpkgs, which I'm going to do, like, now) | 08:17:13 |
| Vladimír Čunát | The left sides should always exist, too (I expect). | 08:17:34 |
| K900 | Yes | 08:17:59 |
| K900 | @Wolfgang Walther beat you to it :P | 08:27:00 |
| K900 | Also I'm pretty sure the webkit thing is ALSO a red herring | 08:27:25 |
| K900 | Because the webkit being pulled in is qtwebkit via qt5.full which they should not have used ANYWAY | 08:27:40 |
| K900 | But when I gave it qtbase it failed with a haskell type error anyway | 08:28:09 |
| K900 | So I'm going to just call it broken and move on | 08:28:18 |
| K900 | @Wolfgang Walther sniped again | 10:24:36 |
| K900 | I'll wait for the CUDA people to weigh in | 10:24:44 |
| Wolfgang Walther | :) | 10:25:03 |
| K900 | I bet they have some custom overlay or something that relies on this cursed behavior | 10:25:20 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | the bad webkitgtk was properly removed a few days ago, qt5 webkit needs to follow soon :P | 10:26:49 |
| K900 | qt5webkit has been marked insecure for ages now | 10:27:03 |
| K900 | It's probably yeetable tbh | 10:27:07 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | webkitgtk was marked insecure too due to libsoup2 | 10:27:23 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * webkitgtk_4_0 was marked insecure too due to libsoup2 | 10:27:33 |
| K900 | Honestly if you want to yeet it be my guest | 10:27:51 |
| K900 | I'm not sure we want to yeet qtwebengine5 yet but qtwebkit can go | 10:28:05 |
| K900 | Actually never mind it doesn't even rebuild those | 10:46:17 |
| K900 | I'll just merge and let CUDA people scream at me later if they want | 10:46:25 |
 hexa | was removed in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/450065 | 11:43:29 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | i know, i approved that PR and would have merged that same day if jan didn't self-merge faster | 11:44:06 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * i know, i approved that PR and would have merged that same day if jan hadn't self-merged | 11:44:19 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | my point was, both was marked insecure, qtwebkit even for longer, so we should also remove both | 11:45:16 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | with the webkitgtk_4_0 the argument was backports of newer webkitgtk ABI during the 25.11 release cycle, but for qtwebkit there isn't any updates at all anymore. So it needs to go. | 11:46:07 |
