!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

316 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/108 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
19 Oct 2025
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverdo we just ignore that fact19:56:12
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccowhat do you mean?19:56:35
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoI think that fixes the bug?19:56:38
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoit's just not in 25819:56:44
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoit's in 258.119:56:49
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveryeah but that rebuilds systemd right19:56:49
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoright, we can't do the patch this cycle19:56:59
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoso we'll do a workaround19:57:04
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverso if we merge staging-next we ship this bug to users19:57:11
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverand given the links this breaks real use cases kinda bad19:57:22
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever* and given the links in the pr thread this breaks real use cases kinda bad19:57:32
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoyea, I just don't think we can actually fix it, right?19:57:58
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccolike we can fix the test by doing something dumb, but I don't think we can actually fix the bug without a systemd patch20:00:28
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforevercan we add a udev rule to fix this20:01:38
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco no because these aren't devices in /sys, right? 20:01:54
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveroh, right, because static_node rules are basically magic20:02:43
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccook yea, confirmed, the PR that's in 258.1 fixes it20:12:05
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco dramforever: do you agree that there's not a reasonable way to fix the underlying bug, other than to just update to 258.1? If so I'm just going to change the test to check a non-static dev node, like /dev/dri/card0, with a note to change it back after 258.1 20:13:07
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverwhen do we expect 258.1 to land? it's the next staging-next right?20:29:19
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveron the release schedule20:29:28
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever well basically, what is this line?
2025-11-01 master (Day before ZHF) Merge staging-next into master, prepare for ZHF. Begin first staging-next cycle
20:31:10
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveris it the staging-next we're doing now?20:31:18
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveror the next one?20:32:19
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoyea20:34:39
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccowe can't get 258.1 in this cycle20:34:46
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoso I'm going to open a PR to update to 258.1 on staging, probably today20:35:06
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveri guess we'll just ship this regression for a few weeks20:38:05
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoyea, kind of a bummer, but I don't really see anything we can do about it20:38:32
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccohttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/45360320:38:39
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverif nobody beats me to it i'll come back after ~10h to test aarch64-linux20:42:41

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6