!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

316 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen108 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
7 Nov 2025
@sandro:supersandro.deSandrocan you bump it?16:19:52
@sandro:supersandro.deSandroseveral people already noticed that thunderbird is missing in the cache16:20:04
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathis is staging-next16:20:12
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro🤔16:28:25
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)I was suggesting just removing darwin from the conditional though18:01:47
@lt1379:matrix.orgLun Is there going to be another staging cycle before branch off?18:12:40
@hexa:lossy.networkhexayes18:17:07
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossah okay18:45:22
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossI can do that18:45:29
8 Nov 2025
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw The nix-drv-index numbers are not as trustworthy as the ones obtained by actual eval, since they don't take into account intermediate derivations that aren't accessible themselves. 06:44:51
@marcusramberg:matrix.orgMarcusgiven the current release cycle, is https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/459886 ok to merge to staging?23:23:04
@k900:0upti.meK900 The release notes look OK 23:24:23
@k900:0upti.meK900 But maybe hold off until branch-off anyway 23:24:31
@k900:0upti.meK900 Just to be safe 23:24:34
9 Nov 2025
@samasaur:matrix.orgsamasaurhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/459987 should fix swift on staging-next07:32:42
@tom:pub.solartom joined the room.08:07:31
@k900:0upti.meK900image.png
Download image.png
10:14:06
@k900:0upti.meK900Can github please fucking not10:14:12
@k900:0upti.meK900 @Wolfgang Walther there's no way to tell it to just stop checking those on automated merges, is there? 10:15:23
@k900:0upti.meK900OK fuck this I give up10:17:45
@k900:0upti.meK900I retried it like five times10:17:53
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherI doubt it. For example checking the rule "creation" times out. I'd say that "whether a new branch is created or not" should be independent from basically everything else. No matter how many commits are merged. Thus, I assume this is just github being github - and short of disabling all branch protection, I don't think we can do much. Even if it worked, I'd not feel comfortable to add the nixpkgs-ci bot account, which does the periodic merges, as a bypasser to all rules. But that's a big if anyway.10:22:20
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherThis is something that should be brought up with GitHub.10:29:35
@9hp71n:matrix.orgghpzin (moved to @ghpzin:envs.net) changed their display name from ghpzin to ghpzin (moved to @ghpzin:envs.net).15:04:11
10 Nov 2025
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco

Hm, somehow https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/442965 broke cross compiling libcap

/nix/store/50qdx59fp8w8bzaq5z8825d3kr3d4cx3-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc-wrapper-14.3.0/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -m64 -s -o $WORK/b001/exe/mknames -rdynamic /build/go-link-625829632/go.o
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-m64'
08:41:42
@k900:0upti.meK900Is Go calling it with -m6408:43:02
@k900:0upti.meK900That would be on brand08:43:10
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccohere's the full build log, if anyone wants to take a look and help me figure out what to do about it: https://gist.github.com/ElvishJerricco/5e6d898075589d671765ccb4effc41f008:44:22
@katexochen:matrix.orgPaul Meyer (katexochen)not sure if that is related but we merged a fix for that PR in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/45886708:48:28
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccothat does not appear to have helped09:10:02

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6