!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

349 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen114 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
20 Jan 2026
@eveeifyeve:matrix.orgeveeifyeveDoes anyone know why nixpkgs-review takes a long time to eval using github eval. before it starts actually doing the work?03:44:54
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgfabianhjrI don't feel it takes a long time, probably close to the network requirement of a couple do en MBs of data being transfered.03:54:17
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgfabianhjr* I don't feel it takes a long time, probably close to the network requirement of a couple of MBs of data being transfered.03:54:28
@lt1379:matrix.orgLunIf you accidentally try to kick off a 50k package rebuild it can oom/hang forever at that stage iirc04:00:35
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She] GHA has slow CPUs and low RAM 04:00:49
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]if you're talking about nixpkgs-review-gha04:01:00
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]if not, then its just taking a while04:01:08
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]it is what it is04:01:13
@k900:0upti.meK900 @emily have we forgot about time64 by default? 09:26:20
@k900:0upti.meK900I lost track09:26:29
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)You mean https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/420063 ?09:31:48
@k900:0upti.meK900Yeah09:32:56
@k900:0upti.meK900I'm thinking we should just send it09:33:22
@k900:0upti.meK900As we're early in the cycle09:33:36
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátRedacted or Malformed Event09:37:58
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátRedacted or Malformed Event09:38:20
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* (practically all linux binaries, mostly waiting on darwin)09:38:39
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátAh, you mean early after branching off stable NixOS.09:39:02
@k900:0upti.meK900Sorry09:39:20
@k900:0upti.meK900Release cycle09:39:21
@k900:0upti.meK900Yeah09:39:25
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI didn't realize that the rebuilds aren't very high.09:49:52
@k900:0upti.meK900It should only affect lib3209:50:23
@k900:0upti.meK900Not that I'm suggesting we get it into this staging09:50:33
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátAh. The PR targets master...09:51:33
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa changed the room topic to "Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/" from "Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/".13:39:31
@innocentzer0:matrix.orginnocentzer0 joined the room.14:24:30
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI still dunno if the juice is worth the squeeze there15:09:08
28 Jun 2021
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.org set the history visibility to "world_readable".15:07:04
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.org changed the room name to "" from "".15:07:04

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6