| 19 Feb 2026 |
 emily | oh for goodness sakes | 12:17:00 |
| emily | https://github.com/scikit-build/scikit-build-core/blob/2ddfb9f436fcfceb404d6a3444f7d6ba1093ea60/tests/test_get_requires.py#L34-L37 | 12:17:04 |
| emily | their fixture just won't work if you built single-arch binaries like we do | 12:17:37 |
| emily | oh, I misunderstood what they were doing… | 12:24:28 |
 K900 | How did we merge that wayland PR wtf | 12:34:07 |
 vcunat | meta.availableOn is easy to miss | 12:35:56 |
| emily | ok, we just need to backport the upstream fix. | 12:36:21 |
| emily | the janky downstream patch was already in-tree to be fair | 12:37:10 |
| emily | it just didn't actually build | 12:37:16 |
| emily | fwiw it seems bad that libX11 and wayland and etc. leaking into the qtbase build environment can affect features | 12:37:42 |
| emily | shouldn't we be specifying all the features manually? with Meson we disable feature autodetection | 12:37:54 |
| emily | not sure if Qt's build system has something similar we could use | 12:37:58 |
 hexa | Pytest 9 | 12:38:08 |
| hexa | But we keep older versions/hooks around | 12:38:24 |
| emily | no worries, it turned out to just be upstream breakage | 12:38:34 |
| emily | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492085, https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492086 | 12:43:06 |
| emily | I can kick off a qtbase build with https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/492078 if it'd be helpful, otherwise that's probably it for me for the cycle | 12:44:56 |
| vcunat | I've built it on aarch64-darwin already. | 12:46:19 |
| vcunat | Finished just now. | 12:46:24 |
| emily | ah, thank you | 12:46:26 |
| emily | FWIW it'd be zero rebuilds to re-enable it and turn the flag off in Qt instead | 12:46:45 |
| emily | so probably safe to merge even if we take a different tack | 12:46:52 |
| vcunat | Thank you 🙂 | 12:52:35 |
| emily | er, sorry for missing the postPatch there | 13:22:43 |
| emily | I was like "why is this there" and didn't even think about it when doing rebuild avoidance | 13:22:53 |
 Fabián Heredia | Hi, could someone trigger a staging-next eval? linux queues are almost empty and there are a couple of fixes for regressions on staging-next | 15:12:19 |
| Fabián Heredia | * Hi, could someone trigger a staging-next eval? linux queues are almost empty and there are a couple of fixes for regressions on staging-next (and last eval is >24 hrs ago) | 15:12:33 |
| vcunat | Let me queue some merges first. | 15:15:35 |
| emily | do we have https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/490978 on the radar btw? | 15:47:02 |
| emily | currently the cache is going to be broken on -next merge | 15:47:26 |
