!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

308 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/105 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
23 Nov 2025
@hexa:lossy.networkhexastill seeing protobuf_30 via apache-orc16:17:18
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand protobuf_33 via opencv16:17:27
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand protobuf_31 via arrow-cpp16:17:45
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand system protobuf is 3216:17:55
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* and default protobuf is 3216:18:04
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathe upcoming staging-next will start recursing into python 3.14 and stop recursing into 3.1216:41:55
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatSo, feel free to suggest what's Hydra's next mass-rebuild task. I expect it will run out of work in 12-24 hours.18:34:07
@k900:0upti.meK900It would be nice to have Qt 6.10.1 after all18:39:02
@k900:0upti.meK900I'm half a qtwebengine and a migraine away from validating it all locally18:39:14
@k900:0upti.meK900But it does have a bunch of rendering fixes18:40:25
@k900:0upti.meK900And one nothingburger technically a CVE18:40:56
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatThough if it's not urgent, you can simply pick it to both branches? (after you just validate it once)18:49:14
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat * Though if it's not urgent, you can simply pick it to both staging and staging-25.11? (after you just validate it once) 18:49:35
@k900:0upti.meK900I can, but it would be nice to have 25.11 ship with it18:50:16
@k900:0upti.meK900Mostly because of the rendering fixes18:50:24
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat Technically I assume we'd do it as a staging-next with just this. 18:53:26
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatMissing the branch-off wouldn't matter. We could do whatever, e.g. pick the commits to 25.11 afterwards.18:53:52
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatThe rebuilds here don't seem very high https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/449572#event-20147631678 but you probably know best how expensive it is.19:00:41
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat(suspicious that there are no darwin rebuilds shown)19:01:00
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat* (I find it suspicious that there are no darwin rebuilds shown)19:01:23
@k900:0upti.meK900We barely have working qt6 on Darwin19:20:26
@k900:0upti.meK900It's about 1.5k jobs per Linux19:20:35
@k900:0upti.meK900https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/46436119:47:30
@eveeifyeve:matrix.orgeveeifyeveShould I look into that?20:26:12
@k900:0upti.meK900I mean if you want to20:30:37
@k900:0upti.meK900So, 1798 Linux jobs21:10:00
@k900:0upti.meK900Thoughts?21:10:02
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaw/e21:11:17
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdaIf this leads to a visibly broken iso people who review the 25.11 release will complain. So I'd say master unless we plan on merging staging-next-25.11 before the release21:27:53
@leona:leona.isleonaIMO merge to master, and preferably today21:33:40

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6