| 8 Jan 2026 |
 Fabián Heredia | Unsure about what happened but seems like there were about >50k rebuilds on nixpkgs:unstable from the previous eval to the current eval | 04:52:39 |
| Fabián Heredia | https://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/unstable | 04:52:42 |
| Fabián Heredia | 
Download image.png | 04:53:01 |
| Fabián Heredia | * Unsure about what happened but seems like there were about ~50k rebuilds on nixpkgs:unstable from the previous eval to the current eval | 04:53:31 |
 whispers [& it/fae] | maybe related: some builds i ran on master were trying to build cargo for aarch64-linux, which absolutely should not have needed a rebuild without staging cycle | 04:53:40 |
| whispers [& it/fae] | * maybe related: some builds i ran on master a few hours ago were trying to build cargo for aarch64-linux, which absolutely should not have needed a rebuild without staging cycle | 04:54:37 |
| whispers [& it/fae] | * maybe related: some builds i ran on master a few hours ago were trying to build cargo for aarch64-linux, which absolutely should not have needed a rebuild without a staging cycle. so something deep in the dependency tree changed somehow | 04:55:36 |
| whispers [& it/fae] | looking at hydra, it seems like cargo (probably some dependent?) had a rebuild on every platform besides x86_64-linux | 05:05:00 |
| whispers [& it/fae] | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/472376 probably this PR | 05:06:15 |
| Fabián Heredia | weird that x86_64-linux would be 0 rebuilds and ofborg/eval also indicates 0 rebuilds 😱 | 05:07:35 |
| Fabián Heredia | 
Download image.png | 05:08:23 |
