| 21 Apr 2026 |
|  BPub changed their profile picture. | 14:10:23 |
 eveeifyeve | Alyssa Ross: I can't find anything that is broken in staging-next for https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/511329. Is all of the issues fixed? | 22:16:20 |
| eveeifyeve | Oh nvm your link linked me to the wrong nix-review problematic deps. | 22:18:56 |
| 22 Apr 2026 |
 Vladimír Čunát | I think we can merge staging-next today. There certainly are some leftover regressions, but not that many in total and I've noticed nothing critical. (saw gimp2, lomiri, qt6Packages.qtwebengine on darwin, appstream and others) | 06:55:04 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Except... does anyone understand this failure? https://hydra.nixos.org/build/326761030 | 07:13:07 |
| Vladimír Čunát | It reproduces on Hydra, but I did not reproduce it in a local release-checks build. | 07:13:29 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Apparently it regressed during the past two days. | 07:14:32 |
 K900 | It's too late for a Pipewire bump, isn't it | 09:22:13 |
| Vladimír Čunát | We have basically all binaries now. | 09:49:57 |
| K900 | Yeah | 09:51:15 |
| K900 | It's not horribly critical at least | 09:51:41 |
| K900 | OK, to staging it goes | 10:01:47 |
 emily | @reckenrode:matrix.org | 11:01:04 |
 Randy Eckenrode | I will have a very brief time this morning to look at it and then lunch. This is my no-rebuild hack. How did it pass the eval check if it now fails to eval? | 11:06:39 |
| emily | it's only failing on x86_64-darwin | 11:09:03 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Okay, but it evals for me on x86_64-darwin, and it evaled in the CI action. | 11:12:39 |
| Randy Eckenrode | That’s the weird part. | 11:12:43 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Oh right, it's broken on master already, not staging-next
https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/unstable/release-checks/all | 11:13:06 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * Oh right, it's broken on master already, not just staging-next
https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/unstable/release-checks/all | 11:13:22 |
| Randy Eckenrode | x86_64-darwin evals for me on staging-next. | 11:14:08 |
| emily | perhaps it's a Nix version thing(???) | 11:14:20 |
| Randy Eckenrode | I’m using Lix, but shouldn’t CI be using whatever the default Nix is? | 11:15:53 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Are release checks always run from Linux? | 11:16:23 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Yes. | 11:18:18 |
| Vladimír Čunát | It does look like an impure problem. | 11:18:40 |
| Randy Eckenrode | The release check also succeeds locally for x86_64-darwin. I’ll try it from Linux next. | 11:20:48 |
| Randy Eckenrode | It also evals on Linux …. | 11:26:57 |
 Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | k, looking | 11:36:13 |
| Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | Hm reproduces locally on 2.28/2.31/2.33/2.34 | 11:39:13 |
| Randy Eckenrode | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/512356 tries to fix it based on the Hydra log. I’m not able to reproduce locally, so if that doesn’t work, we may need to revert the PR splitting out the source releases. | 11:39:24 |
