!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

320 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen111 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
26 Nov 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900Hydra also does not have capacity to run multiple stagings at once in its current state17:11:11
@marcusramberg:matrix.orgMarcusHow does this correlate with the perl and python jobsets? They often take half a week or so, and are run separately from the staging process. I guess they then steal capacity from ongoing staging process?17:13:49
@marcusramberg:matrix.orgMarcus(and other similar ones)17:14:15
@k900:0upti.meK900I don't think there's a perl jobset17:14:42
@k900:0upti.meK900python-updates does steal some capacity17:14:47
@k900:0upti.meK900But it's configured to have a lower priority17:15:01
@marcusramberg:matrix.orgMarcusI'm pretty sure there is 😄17:15:01
@marcusramberg:matrix.orgMarcushttps://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/perl-updates17:15:26
@k900:0upti.meK900That is currently disabled and configured to use 600 shares17:16:31
@leona:leona.isleonapython-updates do currently primarily run on a personal hydra17:16:31
@k900:0upti.meK900Which is very few shares17:16:33
@k900:0upti.meK900Though Hydra scheduling is exceptionally fucked17:16:42
@k900:0upti.meK900And the number of shares is kind of arbitrary and irrelevant17:16:54
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae)i have been curious, how do y'all actually monitor the status of a staging cycle? is it through the eval results at e.g. https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1820494 or…?17:18:45
@k900:0upti.meK900Basically that yes17:18:59
@marcusramberg:matrix.orgMarcusI imagine not a lot of folks want to touch the hydra code base to improve it, given it's catalyst 🙂17:19:57
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátThe PRs have some further useful links: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/46451217:36:05
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) joined the room.18:09:23
@ysun:beeper.comYifei Sun joined the room.22:32:13
@stepbrobd:matrix.org@stepbrobd:matrix.org left the room.22:32:18
@shamrocklee:matrix.orgShamrockLee (Yueh-Shun Li)

Dear staging experts,

I'm authoring a rustPlatform.buildRustPackage fix that passes RUSTFLAGS only if specified or needed to prevent shadowing other *_RUSTFLAGS environment variables. (This partially restore the behavior before PR NixOS/nixpkgs#435278.)

Should I choose staging-next as its target branch for this fix? Since the issue also affects the Nixpkgs 25.11 release, should I backport with the backport staging-25.11 label?

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/464707

22:50:24
@leona:leona.isleona staging-next and staging currently don't make a difference time-wise, so for more clarity I suggest staging. 23:05:01
@leona:leona.isleonaAs this is currently broken in 25.11, a backport to staging-25.11 should also be justified, yes23:05:57
27 Nov 2025
@conatsera:matrix.orgconatsera joined the room.01:16:52
28 Nov 2025
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) changed their display name from grimmauld (any/all) to musl-official | Grimm | any/all.11:35:37
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) changed their display name from musl-official | Grimm | any/all to Grimmauld (any/all).11:36:00
@k900:0upti.meK900 @Yureka (she/her) do you have a consistent repro for the Asahi crash? 18:37:09
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)use firefox18:37:29
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)browse the web18:37:32
@yuka:yuka.devYureka (she/her)it happens consistently after 5-10 min18:37:41

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6