!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

370 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/119 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
15 Feb 2026
@reckenrode:matrix.orgRandy EckenrodeDo I need to target staging-next?17:16:59
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátYes, please.17:17:41
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát The issue plagues staging-next already. 17:17:51
@reckenrode:matrix.orgRandy EckenrodeI retargeted staging-next.17:20:12
@reckenrode:matrix.orgRandy EckenrodeThe only issue is Linux. I didn’t do the patches conditionally. Are we okay on Linux rebuilds currently, or do I need to make these conditional?17:20:42
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyshould probably conditionalize and revert on staging17:28:34
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(maybe I should put up my radical proposal to eliminate master-staging merge conflicts and get rid of the "guarded change + revert on staging" medium...)17:35:32
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily * 17:35:38
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátHow would you get rid of that?17:40:50
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(without increasing rebuild amount in situations like we have with git now)17:41:07
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan changed their display name from matthewcroughan @fosdem to matthewcroughan.17:55:53

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6