!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

315 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/111 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
9 Jul 2021
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerwe should probably do a stable staging PR, hydra only has 7k queued builds17:21:01
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringer Vladimír Čunát hexa do you agree? 17:30:02
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátYes.17:30:36
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI'm just looking whether to include https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/12971717:31:01
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringersure, we can merge a few stragglers, only 1 change has been merged to staging-21.0517:32:01
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringermy server should be back online later today, and I can start doing larger reviews17:32:23
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátIt's the only one: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+base%3Astaging-21.0517:32:24
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(the only one with an open PR)17:32:45
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringermerged17:34:40
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerstarting staging-next-21.05 PR17:34:51
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/129778 and kicked off eval17:39:39
@hexa:lossy.networkhexasorry, yeah. I agree! 18:04:56
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa Vladimír Čunát fwiw: I don't really feel like the last two comments in the cpython pr are actionable for me 18:28:26
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI was posting just some suggestions/observations. Anyway, such darwin issues will be best addressed by someone who has access to a darwin builder. It will be hard otherwise, though OfBorg can often help.18:42:46
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaprecisely, I'm not keen on touching anything darwin really18:44:58
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa * precisely, I'm not keen on touching anything darwin really, hence the feeling of it not being actionable, because I also don't know my way around their bootstrap tarball.18:45:25
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa * precisely, I'm not keen on touching anything darwin really, hence the feeling of it not being actionable, because I also don't know my way around their stdenv or bootstrap tarball.18:45:31
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát I'd wait a couple days; perhaps someone will pick it up, e.g. @thefloweringash. 18:57:45
@hexa:lossy.networkhexapushing 3.9.6 bump in a bit, so we can give that s hot19:22:14
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa * pushing 3.9.6 bump in a bit, so we can give that shot19:22:16
@andreas.schraegle:helsinki-systems.deAndreas Schrägle joined the room.20:17:52
@hexa:lossy.networkhexasadly that went nowhere, but a good time to prepare cpython updates for the next stagind run20:55:40
11 Jul 2021
@rosariopulella:matrix.orgrosariopulella joined the room.15:45:04
@hexa:lossy.networkhexastaging-next-21.05 merged21:41:42
17 Jul 2021
@hexa:lossy.networkhexastdenv and darwin-incompatible changes is what keeps on giving12:06:00
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa * stdenv and darwin-incompatible changes are what keeps on giving12:06:08
@hexa:lossy.networkhexait's not even funny12:06:12
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátWe have lots of major updates in this iteration (glibc, python, perl) so maybe it's exceptional. Or we'll need to amend the mass-rebuild workflow somehow.12:16:16
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát One complication is that OfBorg is basically unusable on anything targeting staging. One could test at least the basic package by filing a PR against master and retargeting it later, but that's not very nice. That way we could get e.g. better pre-testing for x86_64-darwin (and hopefully aarch64-darwin soon). 12:20:59
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát (Well, unusuable just for trying builds; for eval-time checks it's still good.) 12:22:15

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6