 | Staging | 311 Members |
| Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/ | 108 Servers |
| Staging | 311 Members |
| Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.05 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/ | 108 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Dec 2025 | ||
 Fabián Heredia | * Oh, btw thanks for all the PRs/fixes for different packages ghpzin , really appreciate it I think this is mostly ready to be merged into staging. Was going over the list that Alyssa Ross and Yureka (she/her) made on the PR about breakages and only big-ish pending thing is berkleyDB 5.3.z | 05:19:37 |
| Fabián Heredia | yeah, probably | 05:19:48 |
 ghpzin | Okay, I will try to create PRs for leftover fixes I have this week, they should cover most things. Would be nice to have somebody who uses pkgsMusl to get involved, seeing as a lot of things break there. I know some required things, just not whether they are "correct to do".Also there is a pretty scary thing printed in hydra tests and linux_5_10 breaks again with unresolved symbol filp_close after recent kernel update. | 05:22:26 |
| ghpzin | Okay, I will try to create PRs for leftover fixes I have this week, they should cover most things. Would be nice to have somebody who uses pkgsMusl to get involved, seeing as a lot of things break there. I know some required things, just not whether they are "correct to do".Also there is a pretty scary thing printed in hydra tests and linux_5_10 breaks again with unresolved symbol filp_close after recent kernel update (but that one was probably just a matter of time, seeing as it pops up every other kernel/gcc update). | 05:25:53 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | is there a PR against which i should build? | 09:23:30 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | i was building the fancy llvm-native stuff, but a lot of things are broken there. | 09:23:55 |
| ghpzin | You mean musl with gcc15 ? | 09:26:00 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | yes | 09:26:08 |
| ghpzin | No PR, it starts pretty much breaking with just (changing default to 15): https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/440456/commits/5264e09b60c020160780793fa0459b5448646efc | 09:26:51 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | how far does it get on glibc? | 09:28:07 |
| ghpzin | I mean, at least it builds stdenv, which you can't say with pkgsMusl.stdenv | 09:28:56 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | OH GOD | 09:29:04 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | okay fine, i started an stdenv build | 09:30:20 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | i have a suspicion this will suck | 09:31:04 |
| ghpzin | I can write up what I had fixes for including stdenv, gnumake, which and groff.Iirc I stopped at patchutils that required update to one of versions in nixpkgs and backporting some huge commit to the other 2.And generally I am not sure what even worked before on musl. | 09:38:55 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | i got a full interactive graphical nixos session on musl | 09:39:25 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | admittedly with a lot of patches and overlays | 09:39:41 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | that is the tree against which i'll try | 09:39:54 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | https://git.grimmauld.de/Grimmauld/grimm-musl | 09:40:13 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | i do think i'll need patchutils to even just start patching nixpkgs.... | 09:42:19 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | we'll see | 09:42:25 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | (tbf i am doing the nixpkgs patching using glibc packages because i can't be bothered to build those from source twice) | 09:43:29 |
| ghpzin | If you want to look at what I had before: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/7b77cc83217d40c04fa65c00b215a72515d23076 - musl boostrap update https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/441527 - perl fix (should be on staging already)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/7fa91c674ef4bfb4ba26a3ef41a13f6c036c1631 - gnumake https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/41cf7647bb04699fc9d7067f0e7b3ed6d99e8804 - which https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/9c90d46bf949ab3c38b05d9b58c04294f0e31d71 - groff (not sure what I tried to build that failed on that one) https://github.com/twaugh/patchutils/issues/65 - patchutils issue, needs at least https://github.com/twaugh/patchutils/commit/dc88e964427c3d4a376a21dd517ab95c7b6c6ad4 that is in 0.4.3+ but we have 0.3.3,0.3.4 and 0.4.2.And even after updating 0.4.2 -> 0.4.3 iirc it still fails with something else. | 09:54:19 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | right... I'll take a look | 09:56:23 |
| ghpzin | If you want to look at what I had before: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/7b77cc83217d40c04fa65c00b215a72515d23076 - musl boostrap update (needed because of the basename declaration conflict in libiberty.h of gcc15 and strings.h in older musl) - the first reason pkgsMusl.stdenvhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/441527 - perl fix (should be on staging already)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/7fa91c674ef4bfb4ba26a3ef41a13f6c036c1631 - gnumake https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/41cf7647bb04699fc9d7067f0e7b3ed6d99e8804 - which https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/9c90d46bf949ab3c38b05d9b58c04294f0e31d71 - groff (not sure what I tried to build that failed on that one) https://github.com/twaugh/patchutils/issues/65 - patchutils issue, needs at least https://github.com/twaugh/patchutils/commit/dc88e964427c3d4a376a21dd517ab95c7b6c6ad4 that is in 0.4.3+ but we have 0.3.3,0.3.4 and 0.4.2.And even after updating 0.4.2 -> 0.4.3 iirc it still fails with something else. | 10:00:31 |
| ghpzin | If you want to look at what I had before: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/7b77cc83217d40c04fa65c00b215a72515d23076 - musl boostrap update (needed because of the basename declaration conflict in libiberty.h of gcc15 and strings.h in older musl) - the first reason pkgsMusl.stdenv fails to buildhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/441527 - perl fix (should be on staging already)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/7fa91c674ef4bfb4ba26a3ef41a13f6c036c1631 - gnumake https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/41cf7647bb04699fc9d7067f0e7b3ed6d99e8804 - which https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/9c90d46bf949ab3c38b05d9b58c04294f0e31d71 - groff (not sure what I tried to build that failed on that one) https://github.com/twaugh/patchutils/issues/65 - patchutils issue, needs at least https://github.com/twaugh/patchutils/commit/dc88e964427c3d4a376a21dd517ab95c7b6c6ad4 that is in 0.4.3+ but we have 0.3.3,0.3.4 and 0.4.2.And even after updating 0.4.2 -> 0.4.3 iirc it still fails with something else. | 10:00:51 |
| ghpzin | If you want to look at what I had before: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/7b77cc83217d40c04fa65c00b215a72515d23076 - musl boostrap update (needed because of the basename declaration conflict in libiberty.h of gcc15 and string.h in older musl) - the first reason pkgsMusl.stdenv fails to buildhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/441527 - perl fix (should be on staging already)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/7fa91c674ef4bfb4ba26a3ef41a13f6c036c1631 - gnumakehttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/41cf7647bb04699fc9d7067f0e7b3ed6d99e8804 - whichhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/9c90d46bf949ab3c38b05d9b58c04294f0e31d71 - groff (not sure what I tried to build that failed on that one)https://github.com/twaugh/patchutils/issues/65 - patchutils issue, needs at least https://github.com/twaugh/patchutils/commit/dc88e964427c3d4a376a21dd517ab95c7b6c6ad4 that is in 0.4.3+ but we have 0.3.3,0.3.4 and 0.4.2.And even after updating 0.4.2 -> 0.4.3 iirc it still fails with something else. | 10:04:53 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | oh no basename | 10:06:10 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/414299#discussion_r2573260397 i had fun with basename gfcc 15 already | 10:06:34 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | * https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/414299#discussion_r2573260397 i had fun with basename gcc 15 already | 10:06:41 |