| 15 Dec 2025 |
K900 | I wonder if they're actually fuzzing it | 08:49:09 |
Grimmauld (any/all) | Oh god | 08:49:18 |
@ghpzin:envs.net | That is some new python version thing (just linked in issue):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/beautifulsoup/+bug/2134393 | 08:53:16 |
K900 | Ah | 08:53:43 |
K900 | Minor Python version updates breaking libraries | 08:53:51 |
K900 | Must be a day that ends in Y | 08:53:54 |
@ghpzin:envs.net | * That is some new python version thing (just linked in issue):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/beautifulsoup/+bug/2134393
https://git.launchpad.net/beautifulsoup/commit/?id=55f655ffb7ef03bdd1df0f013743831fe54e3c7a | 08:54:23 |
vcunat | It's normal for patch-level python3 updates to break some stuff. | 08:59:37 |
vcunat | Always at least a few tests in python3Packages. | 08:59:51 |
vcunat | * It's normal for patch-level python3 updates to break some stuff, sadly. | 09:00:04 |
| Capypara joined the room. | 09:23:27 |
| Jules Lamur joined the room. | 10:11:33 |
| Artem Leshchev joined the room. | 18:48:09 |
Fabián Heredia | Re: short 25.11-analog staging-next for unstable
I think the only high >= severity security fix would be libpng and others would be delayed glib which probably has more usage)
If that short staging-next cycle would be about a couple of days the next staging-next cycle would start around holidays (navidad + new year in my case) and I would rather do any pending gcc fixes before then to have less to think about during winter holidays xd | 19:58:24 |
Fabián Heredia | * Re: short 25.11-analog staging-next for unstable
I think the only high >= severity security fix would be libpng and others would be delayed like glib which probably has more usage)
If that short staging-next cycle would be about a couple of days the next staging-next cycle would start around holidays (navidad + new year in my case) and I would rather do any pending gcc fixes before then to have less to think about during winter holidays xd | 19:58:47 |