| 7 Oct 2025 |
 Marie | gcc 15 cross fix? đď¸ đď¸ | 08:19:08 |
 VladimĂr ÄunĂĄt | Because once we have three different mass-rebuild branches, it becomes tough. | 08:19:08 |
 K900 | Do we need it in 25.11? | 08:19:30 |
 leona | I would personally say after the next staging-next would be fine | 08:19:32 |
| K900 | I'd rather not touch GCC at this point | 08:19:53 |
| leona | as then we probably have enough time to do another staiging-next before ZHF (or at least near that) | 08:20:02 |
| Marie | not really to be fair | 08:20:05 |
| leona | ah, maybe i miscalculated, it would be fine anyway i think | 08:20:47 |
| leona | (not fully awake yet....) | 08:20:55 |
| VladimĂr ÄunĂĄt | For these big changes it's like... if we want them in 25.11, better now. So it's good to decide early. | 08:20:59 |
| VladimĂr ÄunĂĄt | Oh, on Hydra I should first deal with blockers that prevented the previous staging-next from reaching nixpkgs-unstable. But after that I count on new staging-next eval. | 08:39:35 |
| VladimĂr ÄunĂĄt | at least once postgres deadlocks let it pass through. | 08:49:58 |
 sterni (he/him) | K900, Alyssa Ross: yes we use ld.gold for Haskell. Itâs technically not required anymore, but we tried ld.bfd in the summer and it just takes a million years to link anything | 09:14:10 |
| sterni (he/him) | using lld would probably be worth a try in order to get rid of gold, but itâs more complicated to wire up and Iâm not sure how linking C++ libs would fare on linux | 09:14:52 |
| VladimĂr ÄunĂĄt | đ¤ coreutils update?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445644 | 09:47:31 |
| VladimĂr ÄunĂĄt | So that this cycle isn't too boring đ | 09:47:49 |
| VladimĂr ÄunĂĄt | Based on the announcement I'd say it's unlikely to break stuff, though. | 09:49:27 |
| VladimĂr ÄunĂĄt | So I'm leaning towards merging now. | 09:49:42 |
| VladimĂr ÄunĂĄt | Randy Eckenrode: you want this PR in 25.11?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445095 | 09:55:30 |
| VladimĂr ÄunĂĄt | I'll be optimistic. Shout early if you disagree. | 10:16:37 |
