!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

350 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen115 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
7 Oct 2025
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverthis is also not some "randomly failing" thing07:59:48
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever it is just one configure.ac mistaking confusing --enable-default-pie with --enable-host-pie 08:00:26
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverso if we don't touch any gcc configs we won't randomly start running into it08:00:41
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)The breaking changes freeze was moved one week, so technically we can still do it now08:02:05
@k900:0upti.meK900We shouldn't08:02:23
@k900:0upti.meK900IMO08:02:24
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)That I am not disagreeing with08:05:05
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI don't think this is a breaking change.08:09:26
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátLooks even backportable to 25.05 to me. (though there probably isn't any need to, as we don't pass the option)08:10:06
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátThough is it OK to let this be unfixed on 25.11?08:11:44
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI suppose we could always deal with it once someone runs into it.08:11:58
@k900:0upti.meK900 I don't think it's unfixed 08:12:10
@k900:0upti.meK900 It's just that we build our bootstrap GCCs extra weird 08:12:22
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverthis is not going to affect any user if it builds fine08:13:03
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát And apart from this gcc patch, there's consensus on everything else, starting staging-next now-ish from the current staging? 08:13:42
@k900:0upti.meK900 I think we should be fine 08:14:24
@k900:0upti.meK900 Unless anyone has anything else 08:14:44
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát I'm a bit unclear about when we do staging-next-25.05, as we should at some point. What will be the best moment. 08:16:18
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(I don't recall anything else)08:17:18
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátMaybe there will be a suitable point before 25.11 mass-rebuild-diverges from master.08:18:30
@marie:marie.cologneMariegcc 15 cross fix? 👉️ 👈️08:19:08
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátBecause once we have three different mass-rebuild branches, it becomes tough.08:19:08
@k900:0upti.meK900Do we need it in 25.11?08:19:30
@leona:leona.isleonaI would personally say after the next staging-next would be fine08:19:32
@k900:0upti.meK900 I'd rather not touch GCC at this point 08:19:53
@leona:leona.isleonaas then we probably have enough time to do another staiging-next before ZHF (or at least near that)08:20:02
@marie:marie.cologneMarie not really to be fair 08:20:05
@leona:leona.isleonaah, maybe i miscalculated, it would be fine anyway i think08:20:47
@leona:leona.isleona(not fully awake yet....)08:20:55
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát For these big changes it's like... if we want them in 25.11, better now. So it's good to decide early. 08:20:59

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6