| 7 Oct 2025 |
Vladimír Čunát | Yes. I didn't realize that we're bumping very soon. | 07:57:59 |
K900 | Well I assume we'll do it first cycle after 25.11 | 07:58:49 |
K900 | At this point | 07:58:56 |
dramforever | this is also not some "randomly failing" thing | 07:59:48 |
dramforever | it is just one configure.ac mistaking confusing --enable-default-pie with --enable-host-pie | 08:00:26 |
dramforever | so if we don't touch any gcc configs we won't randomly start running into it | 08:00:41 |
Grimmauld (any/all) | The breaking changes freeze was moved one week, so technically we can still do it now | 08:02:05 |
K900 | We shouldn't | 08:02:23 |
K900 | IMO | 08:02:24 |
Grimmauld (any/all) | That I am not disagreeing with | 08:05:05 |
Vladimír Čunát | I don't think this is a breaking change. | 08:09:26 |
Vladimír Čunát | Looks even backportable to 25.05 to me. (though there probably isn't any need to, as we don't pass the option) | 08:10:06 |
Vladimír Čunát | Though is it OK to let this be unfixed on 25.11? | 08:11:44 |
Vladimír Čunát | I suppose we could always deal with it once someone runs into it. | 08:11:58 |
K900 | I don't think it's unfixed | 08:12:10 |
K900 | It's just that we build our bootstrap GCCs extra weird | 08:12:22 |
dramforever | this is not going to affect any user if it builds fine | 08:13:03 |
Vladimír Čunát | And apart from this gcc patch, there's consensus on everything else, starting staging-next now-ish from the current staging? | 08:13:42 |
K900 | I think we should be fine | 08:14:24 |
K900 | Unless anyone has anything else | 08:14:44 |
Vladimír Čunát | I'm a bit unclear about when we do staging-next-25.05, as we should at some point. What will be the best moment. | 08:16:18 |
Vladimír Čunát | (I don't recall anything else) | 08:17:18 |
Vladimír Čunát | Maybe there will be a suitable point before 25.11 mass-rebuild-diverges from master. | 08:18:30 |
Marie | gcc 15 cross fix? 👉️ 👈️ | 08:19:08 |
Vladimír Čunát | Because once we have three different mass-rebuild branches, it becomes tough. | 08:19:08 |
K900 | Do we need it in 25.11? | 08:19:30 |
leona | I would personally say after the next staging-next would be fine | 08:19:32 |
K900 | I'd rather not touch GCC at this point | 08:19:53 |
leona | as then we probably have enough time to do another staiging-next before ZHF (or at least near that) | 08:20:02 |
Marie | not really to be fair | 08:20:05 |