!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

349 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen115 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
5 Oct 2025
@hexa:lossy.networkhexae.g. blocking a browser update12:47:56
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* e.g. blocking a major browser update12:48:01
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát staging-next merged 13:33:05
@k900:0upti.meK900 So are we doing 25.05 then 13:34:14
@k900:0upti.meK900 With the Redis fixes 13:34:33
@k900:0upti.meK900I would prefer unstable to get the Qt changes first tbh but ehhhhhhhh13:34:58
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawell13:40:21
@hexa:lossy.networkhexayou probably can't promise me we'll to 25.05 after another staging cycle either 😄 13:40:37
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* you probably can't promise me we'll do 25.05 after another staging cycle either 😄 13:40:43
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI think we can kill that eval https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/372501#discussion_r240449947414:04:33
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawell, we likely have time to build stuff, but that eval will likely not pass tested14:08:45
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahopefully not14:08:49
@hexa:lossy.networkhexanvm, this went to staging14:13:17
@noob_tea:matrix.orgtea joined the room.14:34:06
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát We (still) do have cmake 4 -triggered blockers for nixos-unstable. 15:34:47
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * We (still) do have cmake 4 -triggered blocker(s) for nixos-unstable. 15:35:06
@k900:0upti.meK900touchegg, really17:07:08
@k900:0upti.meK900Can we just kill that thing already17:07:19
6 Oct 2025
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátUp to me, I guess: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/44904006:46:38
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát I'll merge fast, so that I can bump the tested job and discover more regressions early. 06:47:07
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * I'll merge fast, so that I can bump the tested job and discover more channel-blocking regressions early. 06:47:15
@willi:butz.cloudWilli Butz joined the room.13:02:29
@dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud@dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud joined the room.15:27:22
@ty:tjll.nettylerjl

Hey, I'm not a committer but trying to assist where able

I'm looking at some CVEs for binutils 2.44 and since the patches are only in 2.45/unstable I was going to backport them to 2.44. I assume I should base on staging since (I'm assuming) the package is likely a dependency across a pretty wide blast radius?

15:49:25
@k900:0upti.meK900Yes15:50:20
@k900:0upti.meK900But also we might just land 2.45?15:50:27
@k900:0upti.meK900I don't know what the plan for that is15:50:35
@k900:0upti.meK900 @Fabián Heredia? 15:50:42
@ty:tjll.nettylerjlMy understanding was that it follows the "odd versions are implicitly unstable" but that'd work too15:51:39
@ty:tjll.nettylerjl I mis-remembered, it's that they aren't shipping with gold in 2.45 15:54:52

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6