!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

342 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/113 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
11 Nov 2025
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco vcunat: you want to author the commit / PR or do you want me to? 11:35:02
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI don't care really.11:35:24
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátBut I'm relatively busy today.11:35:30
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(with work stuff)11:35:36
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátSo either way I won't have capacity for longer discussion about the changes.11:36:53
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccohttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/46063911:39:43
@winston:winston.shwinstonI was looking into the arrow-cpp test failure on darwin, strangely the binary of the tests that fail end up with two versions of protobuf in the dynamic linker paths v31, which is what we want in the derivation, v33 coming from somewhere else whats stranger is that master also shows v32, but it doesn't have the same runtime error I compiled it with -fsanitize=address and that pointed me into this direction: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/issues/5290 https://gist.github.com/nekowinston/f6cbea976ba4605f318b9329d96a054411:52:38

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6