!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

343 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen114 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
6 Jan 2026
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeververy confused19:40:33
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever* they'll be very confused19:40:44
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforevershell just sits there doing nothing19:40:46
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverbut i was thinking in that case we could also slip this into staging-nixos and land it on master, while the -next -> master is going on19:42:00
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverthe main problem is that qemu upstream seems to be just sleeping on this19:43:27
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyhas no other distro updated glibc?20:04:23
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27gentoo has (there are bugreports on that matter on their end), fedora has (already as part of f43)20:08:09
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátUbuntu 25.10 also has 2.42, at a glance.20:10:10
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27 anyways, left a comment in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/471270 because I'm not sure if just shipping the patches would be OK here. 20:31:10
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgfabianhjrFYI seems like those have already been reviewed by at least one person and sent via de indicated channel. Left a comment pointing to the upstream processes for inclusion/merging.20:37:38
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyso if it's just termios… are non-interactive shells not affected?21:35:35
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyi.e. actually Nix binfmt builders should be fine and it's just QEMU user emulation of interactive terminal programs?21:35:43
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythat seems niche enough that it's probably not a blocker IMO21:35:49
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyOTOH Gentoo is patching I guess?21:37:59
7 Jan 2026
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
so if it's just termios… are non-interactive shells not affected?
non-interactive programs are not affected. the top level nix build run in a pty and i hope those are unaffected?
04:25:05
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverand running cross-arch containers feels like it's, quite common among qemu-user users04:25:55
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilysounds like the projected impact shouldn't be world-ending even if we wait for upstream and they're a bit slow at least?05:11:56
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI've used qemu-user a nontrivial number of times in my life but I think almost never to run interactive terminal programs05:12:31
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
sounds like the projected impact shouldn't be world-ending even if we wait for upstream and they're a bit slow at least?
it shouldn't be hard to have users manually overlay qemu with the patches either
08:23:52
8 Jan 2026
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgfabianhjrI am hopeful that it will be upstreamed within 2 weeks now that several distros have picked it up and the patches have been sent on the correct channel. Only blocker could be authorship/license due to the patches being submitted by someone who isn't the author00:32:50
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgfabianhjrUnsure about what happened but seems like there were about >50k rebuilds on nixpkgs:unstable from the previous eval to the current eval04:52:39
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgfabianhjrhttps://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/unstable04:52:42
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgfabianhjrimage.png
Download image.png
04:53:01
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgfabianhjr* Unsure about what happened but seems like there were about ~50k rebuilds on nixpkgs:unstable from the previous eval to the current eval04:53:31
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) maybe related: some builds i ran on master were trying to build cargo for aarch64-linux, which absolutely should not have needed a rebuild without staging cycle 04:53:40
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) * maybe related: some builds i ran on master a few hours ago were trying to build cargo for aarch64-linux, which absolutely should not have needed a rebuild without staging cycle 04:54:37
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) * maybe related: some builds i ran on master a few hours ago were trying to build cargo for aarch64-linux, which absolutely should not have needed a rebuild without a staging cycle. so something deep in the dependency tree changed somehow 04:55:36
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae)looking at hydra, it seems like cargo (probably some dependent?) had a rebuild on every platform besides x86_64-linux05:05:00
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae)https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/472376 probably this PR05:06:15
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgfabianhjrweird that x86_64-linux would be 0 rebuilds and ofborg/eval also indicates 0 rebuilds 😱05:07:35

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6