| 18 May 2026 |
hexa |
virtio_net virtio6 ens9: renamed from eth1
| 12:04:14 |
| Marcel joined the room. | 12:06:29 |
Eli Saado | wew I've literally had this issue yesterday | 12:38:15 |
Eli Saado | you can use udevadm test-builtin net_setup_link /sys/class/net/ens18 to debug if you have an interactive shell I guess | 12:38:55 |
| famfo joined the room. | 14:49:06 |
André Lima | Fix for nixosTests.misc: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/521677 | 19:25:16 |
André Lima | Also, regarding the nixosTests.installer.simple test, I'm seeing that the installer can't resolve DNS queries. Is this normal/intended? | 21:03:49 |
K900 | Yes | 21:04:37 |
K900 | The installer runs fully offline | 21:04:41 |
K900 | The idea is that everything required for the base install is on the image already | 21:04:50 |
K900 | So things that are missing need to be added to the image | 21:04:56 |
André Lima | Okay, thank you! | 21:07:56 |
| 19 May 2026 |
André Lima | I've updated this PR. It now fixes all of the nixosTests failing here: https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1825464 | 00:48:52 |
| @marienz:matrix.org joined the room. | 13:31:40 |
| @marienz:matrix.org changed their display name from Marien Zwart to marienz. | 13:33:31 |
@marienz:matrix.org | regarding the python3Packages.narwhals build failure: https://github.com/marienz/nixpkgs/commit/959bdf4b779161340a00694fd075b91fbc14dc9a makes it build (by applying three upstream commits to tests), but I'm not familiar with that package so I don't know how to test it further. Is it helpful for me to send that as a PR (and if so: directly against staging-next or some other branch first), or better to wait for the maintainer / someone else more familiar with it?
(I'm just keeping an eye on that staging-next merge because it has some other stuff I'm looking forward to)
| 13:39:13 |
Grimmauld (any/all) | fixes to things regressed in a cycle go to staging-next, generally | 13:50:19 |
Grimmauld (any/all) | there is very few exceptions (e.g. platform specific regressions where one platform already had a successful build we'd be throwing away, then it depends) | 13:51:00 |
@marienz:matrix.org | thanks, sent https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/521951 | 13:59:28 |
leona | hydra also agrees that all tests of small's tested are fixed | 14:24:06 |
| tbutter joined the room. | 18:05:13 |
| julie changed their display name from uku to julie. | 18:23:11 |
| 20 May 2026 |
Ryan Burns | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/522136 | 03:20:34 |
dramforever | looks like https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/517138 missed the current staging-next | 04:29:59 |
Emil Thorsøe | if this only affects i686 build that has now failed, anything built after that has not been built? | 04:31:43 |
dramforever | i think to avoid git troubles we should just merge 26a26d898abd into staging-next | 04:36:35 |
dramforever | * i think to avoid git troubles we should just merge the head of #517138 namely 26a26d898abd into staging-next | 04:36:49 |
dramforever | (also posted on pr) | 04:37:06 |
Vladimír Čunát | I don't think it helps git merge troubles, but it seemed cleaner not to have duplicate commits in the history of the same branch. | 05:39:44 |
Vladimír Čunát | So I remerged it. | 05:39:59 |