| 30 Jun 2026 |
 K900 | And get back to you in 3-5 business days | 10:00:27 |
 guillaume | I can start a bisect | 10:21:24 |
| K900 | Ahead of you | 10:21:43 |
| K900 | 
Download Unfortunately, | 10:21:59 |
 cSanthiago | I don't wanna bother, I see you are doing a lot of work on this merge, this is the first one I am trying to follow up... I am failing to understand how you pick the packages to fix.
I try to look on asnible, but at the end it looks like is failing just becouse one dependancy in queued, and ansible is missing it.
If it is a complex answer I can ask again after the merge is done.
| 10:40:36 |
| K900 | The answer is mostly "things that break a lot of other things" | 10:41:04 |
| K900 | And also, realistically, "things we personally use" | 10:41:13 |
| cSanthiago | (L)
| 10:41:30 |
| K900 | https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/ has autogenerated statistics for what packages block the most other things | 10:41:59 |
| cSanthiago | Last one, for python stuff it looks like works on eventual consistency, is it correct? at some point the dependacies will be built and the package build will not fail
| 10:43:09 |
| K900 | Generally, the package should not start being built | 10:43:23 |
| K900 | Until all of its dependencies are | 10:43:27 |
| K900 | If it complains about a dependency being missing, that's likely a garbage collector race condition that we're still trying to track down | 10:43:51 |
| cSanthiago | got it, thank you
| 10:44:23 |
| cSanthiago | I looked at this link several times, but went directly to x86, I blinded myself
| 10:45:11 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | My server config just finished building on my rock | 11:02:13 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | we'll see whether it works after a reboot | 11:02:26 |
| cSanthiago | I will be quite after this one: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/333537138#tabs-buildsteps, hydra has two build steps for python httpio, one failed and one succeed, when hydra tries to build ansible it fails because httpio reported the failed status https://hydra.nixos.org/build/333512105.
is this assumption correct?
| 11:05:00 |
| K900 | No, that's a queue runner bug | 11:08:14 |
| K900 | Anyway, you should not worry about it right now | 11:08:21 |
| K900 | Because we will reattempt all failed builds before the end of the cycle | 11:08:29 |
| cSanthiago | got it | 11:15:50 |
 emily | I know what's up with the Darwin linking issues | 12:07:35 |
| emily | can try to submit a PR later today but if anyone wants to beat me to it they can copy https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/536363 | 12:08:23 |
| emily | might be a little whack a mole until next cycle unfortunately, sorry for the overzealous cleanup | 12:08:48 |
 Myria | I'm just testing pango and tk rn | 12:21:11 |
| K900 | In case anyone is wondering, the paperless bisect is still going on iteration 1 | 13:10:12 |
| K900 | I've built a Rust and now I need to build an X server | 13:10:29 |
| K900 | At least it doesn't seem to have browser engines in the closure? | 13:10:42 |
 juliusfreudenberger | I can imagine Rust, but an X Server?! | 13:11:58 |
