| 20 May 2026 |
Emil Thorsøe | if this only affects i686 build that has now failed, anything built after that has not been built? | 04:31:43 |
dramforever | i think to avoid git troubles we should just merge 26a26d898abd into staging-next | 04:36:35 |
dramforever | * i think to avoid git troubles we should just merge the head of #517138 namely 26a26d898abd into staging-next | 04:36:49 |
dramforever | (also posted on pr) | 04:37:06 |
Vladimír Čunát | I don't think it helps git merge troubles, but it seemed cleaner not to have duplicate commits in the history of the same branch. | 05:39:44 |
Vladimír Čunát | So I remerged it. | 05:39:59 |
Vladimír Čunát | * So I remerged the old commit. | 05:40:08 |
Vladimír Čunát | staging-next merged. | 11:50:44 |
K900 | UHhh | 11:51:46 |
K900 | Abort | 11:51:47 |
K900 | ABORT | 11:51:50 |
K900 | We have a pretty bad regression for graphical desktops | 11:52:07 |
hexa | already merged | 11:52:27 |
hexa | 2 mins ago | 11:52:37 |
K900 | Ugh | 11:52:48 |
K900 | So what the fuck do we do about everyone's xdg autostart being broken | 11:53:03 |
leona | fix it? | 11:54:34 |
K900 | Yeah but we don't know what a good fix is | 11:54:41 |
K900 | And we probably don't want to ship this staging cycle out before we have that | 11:54:55 |
K900 | I have a fix but it's horrible and I don't trust myself enough to send it | 11:55:12 |
Vladimír Čunát | So should I prevent unstable-small from getting this? | 11:59:11 |
K900 | I think so | 11:59:26 |
Vladimír Čunát | I wouldn't expect it very relevant to desktop usage, but 🤷 | 11:59:39 |
K900 | Well -small is maybe fine, large channels definitely not | 12:00:09 |
hexa | how big is your xdg shit in rebuilds | 12:00:19 |
hexa | because we need to eat the staging-next anyhow | 12:00:26 |
hexa | so nixos-unstable would run for a day or two anyhow | 12:00:40 |
K900 | systemd.package big at the very least | 12:01:00 |
hexa | a systemd rebuild is around 25k rebuilds per platform | 12:02:36 |
K900 | systemd.package NixOS option | 12:03:16 |