| 24 May 2026 |
 matthewcroughan | for a patch to fuse | 22:44:46 |
| matthewcroughan | * Anyone been getting this? | 22:44:49 |
 Ryan Burns | Confirmed, looks like this broke in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/516786, rebasing onto master (and applying the patch unconditionally, since it's gated on aarch64) reveals the same mismatch for me. I think that patch should be unconditional anyway, would avoid this issue for future bumps that aren't tested on aarch64. | 23:00:21 |
 ElvishJerricco | I guess that patch got struck by the full_index thing? | 23:25:29 |
| ElvishJerricco | or is that fetchpatch2? | 23:25:41 |
| ElvishJerricco | (that's fetchpatch2) | 23:28:09 |
| ElvishJerricco | so I don't understand how they did update the hash but got the wrong one | 23:28:53 |
| Ryan Burns | Ah, I think that is ordinary fetchpatch, so maybe it is just a full_index thing. | 23:30:57 |
| ElvishJerricco | no like fetchpatch2 is the one where using full_index matters | 23:32:26 |
| ElvishJerricco | fetchpatch removes that stuff | 23:32:38 |
| 25 May 2026 |
 Vladimír Čunát | New staging-next-25.11, I guess:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/524014 | 13:20:47 |
 hexa | it's not a guess if you are already doing :p | 13:53:47 |
| 26 May 2026 |
|  phanirithvij changed their display name from loudgolem to phanirithvij. | 11:40:44 |
|  Myria joined the room. | 13:07:57 |
 Ramses 🇵🇸 | When backporting a PR that rebuilds all nixos tests but not many other packages, and so was merged into staging-nixos, should I backport this to the stable release branch (like we merged to master before we had staging-nixos), or to the stable staging branch? | 20:59:00 |
| Vladimír Čunát | In the workflow so far, I'd say stable but coordinate with kernel updates. | 21:01:33 |
| Vladimír Čunát | In future, perhaps https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/512923 | 21:02:11 |
| Ramses 🇵🇸 | Yeah, CI creates a blocking review saying that it should go to staging, but it feels like we'll be delaying such PRs by a lot in that case. So I guess I'm down to catching the next kernel release and pressing the merge button at the right time | 21:12:57 |
| 27 May 2026 |
| Vladimír Čunát | emily: does the x86_64-darwin drop need any mass rebuilds? Perhaps it will be easier to do directly on master? | 08:14:09 |
| Vladimír Čunát | (no waiting, no intertwining with mass-rebuild changes, etc.) | 08:14:40 |
|  @marienz:matrix.org left the room. | 08:28:38 |
|  isabel changed their profile picture. | 21:16:56 |
| 29 May 2026 |
|  julie changed their profile picture. | 23:19:18 |
| 31 May 2026 |
|  Aliaksandr set a profile picture. | 00:30:58 |
|  keysmashes joined the room. | 12:02:47 |
 Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | Apparently gnome is busted now on staging because of a dependency cycle in sysprof outputs. Known? | 15:12:31 |
| hexa | staging-next is too far out, so if trofi isn't using gnome (he uses niri now), then we won't know :p | 15:13:08 |
| Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | The -next would be after 25.11 one? | 15:19:48 |
 K900 | We may want to do 26.05 | 15:20:25 |
| K900 | If there's important security fixes | 15:20:31 |
