!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

393 Members
Staging merges | Find currently open staging-next PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+sort%3Aupdated-desc+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-21.05+is%3Aopen127 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
19 May 2026
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)fixes to things regressed in a cycle go to staging-next, generally13:50:19
@grimmauld:m.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)there is very few exceptions (e.g. platform specific regressions where one platform already had a successful build we'd be throwing away, then it depends)13:51:00
@marienz:matrix.org@marienz:matrix.orgthanks, sent https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/52195113:59:28
@leona:leona.isleona hydra also agrees that all tests of small's tested are fixed 14:24:06
@tbutter:matrix.orgtbutter joined the room.18:05:13
@uku:rei.uku.moejulie changed their display name from uku to julie.18:23:11
20 May 2026
@r-burns:matrix.orgRyan Burnshttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/52213603:20:34
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverlooks like https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/517138 missed the current staging-next04:29:59
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil Thorsøeif this only affects i686 build that has now failed, anything built after that has not been built?04:31:43
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveri think to avoid git troubles we should just merge 26a26d898abd into staging-next04:36:35
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever* i think to avoid git troubles we should just merge the head of #517138 namely 26a26d898abd into staging-next04:36:49
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever(also posted on pr)04:37:06
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI don't think it helps git merge troubles, but it seemed cleaner not to have duplicate commits in the history of the same branch.05:39:44
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátSo I remerged it.05:39:59
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* So I remerged the old commit.05:40:08
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát staging-next merged. 11:50:44
@k900:0upti.meK900UHhh11:51:46
@k900:0upti.meK900Abort11:51:47
@k900:0upti.meK900ABORT11:51:50
@k900:0upti.meK900We have a pretty bad regression for graphical desktops11:52:07
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaalready merged11:52:27
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa2 mins ago11:52:37
@k900:0upti.meK900Ugh11:52:48
@k900:0upti.meK900 So what the fuck do we do about everyone's xdg autostart being broken 11:53:03
@leona:leona.isleonafix it?11:54:34
@k900:0upti.meK900 Yeah but we don't know what a good fix is 11:54:41
@k900:0upti.meK900 And we probably don't want to ship this staging cycle out before we have that 11:54:55
@k900:0upti.meK900 I have a fix but it's horrible and I don't trust myself enough to send it 11:55:12
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát So should I prevent unstable-small from getting this? 11:59:11
@k900:0upti.meK900I think so11:59:26

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6