!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

388 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/128 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
31 May 2026
@hexa:lossy.networkhexain the meantime I'm wondering where we could get another aarch64-linux builder15:23:24
@winston:winston.shwinstoni'll take a look at gnome15:30:09
@leona:leona.isleonaleaseweb has some (I don't know if they satisfy your requirements tho)15:31:14
@leona:leona.isleonaFRA (DE) / AMS (NL) if EU-based15:31:43
@hexa:lossy.networkhexafrom 274 EUR + VAT15:36:35
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa~331,50 EUR15:36:49
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaRedacted or Malformed Event15:36:53
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawith 128GB RAM 🫠15:37:04
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa391 EUR with 256GB RAM15:37:42
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaRedacted or Malformed Event15:37:45
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaRedacted or Malformed Event15:37:48
@winston:winston.shwinston I ran into one build error so far https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/3109eaae18e09d0b8aef23dc2579e7d94b8d4b4e/pkgs/os-specific/linux/fuse/common.nix#L35-L39
shouldn't this be using fetchpatch2 because of the long commit hash format?
17:17:45
@winston:winston.shwinston* I ran into one build error so far https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/90a6e9557b833557b9573503e2a980b3cfc57d41/pkgs/os-specific/linux/fuse/common.nix#L38-L42 shouldn't this be using fetchpatch2 because of the long commit hash format?17:18:20
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco winston: open the link, you'll see short hashes 17:19:35
@winston:winston.shwinston ah my bad I was looking at the from part in the first line yeah 17:20:01
@winston:winston.shwinstonthen i guess its just a mismatch now for some reason17:20:10
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossthat's not good…17:21:29
@winston:winston.shwinston I guess they got the hash from nix store prefetch-url rather than fetchpatch 17:21:52
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossChanged two weeks ago…17:22:49
@leona:leona.isleona

1w4j6f1awjrycycpvmlv0x5v9gprllh4dnbjxl4dyl2jgbkaw6pa was converted to sha256-UsLE14P50Ell0xo3PESk5tIHH2HLalsaWiEubO9KdPE=, but

λ nix hash to-sri 1w4j6f1awjrycycpvmlv0x5v9gprllh4dnbjxl4dyl2jgbkaw6pa --type sha256
sha256-6hqu5npSUN8I7XLZRiCl+b60Sweb1n2ZZz5LroIzkvA= 
17:23:19
@winston:winston.shwinstonyes thats what i get17:23:35
@winston:winston.shwinstonand UsLE is what prefetch-url gave me, thus the assumption17:23:50
@winston:winston.shwinstonI'll open a PR17:23:56
@winston:winston.shwinstonhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/52642917:26:07
1 Jun 2026
@winston:winston.shwinstonfinally hit the dependency cycle in sysprof01:10:11
@winston:winston.shwinston looks like sysprof-50.0-lib/libexec/sysprofd gets wrapped on staging, while it doesn't on master 01:11:08
@winston:winston.shwinstonand the wrapper references $out from $lib01:11:24
@winston:winston.shwinstonI don't quite get why since I don't see a diff between staging and master? 🤔01:13:27
@winston:winston.shwinstonmaybe its because of this? https://github.com/nixOS/nixpkgs/commit/a0ee89704420278abb4c28c7b974500b0d19d39c01:24:43
@winston:winston.shwinstonyea I can confirm, reverting this makes sysprof build again01:34:33

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6