!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

384 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/125 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
17 May 2026
@winston:winston.shwinstonah yeah i was just worried about missing this cycle, thanks đŸ™‚23:15:03
18 May 2026
@leona:leona.isleona26.05 branchoff currently waits for the staging-next merge :)06:34:03
@ethancedwards8:matrix.orgethancedwards8 joined the room.06:44:04
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat I believe we need to change the schedule in future releases. It's like... this staging-next was still allowed to get breaking changes - even to release-critical packages. 06:47:11
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat For some reason the schedule assumes that we can do a staging-next iteration every week. 06:47:27
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat But the reality is every month. (as there's the old stable release, too) 06:47:51
@leona:leona.isleonaThe release requires much more coordination with staging currently than stated in the TL07:00:44
@leona:leona.isleonaOr actually anywhere in the release wiki07:00:59
@leona:leona.isleonaBut I guess that’s also more a culture thing07:01:08
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat Some important tests fail on staging-next reproducibly, e.g. nixosTests.misc or others in https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1825464 08:15:17
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat(i.e. unstable-small would get blocked if merged now)08:15:35
@k900:0upti.meK900Installer tests are looking like the usual bootstrap nonsense again08:16:22
@k900:0upti.meK900IPv6 test seem to be failing because something changed about interface names?08:17:48
@k900:0upti.meK900
client_defaults: waiting for success: [ `ip -o -6 addr show dev eth1 scope link -tentative -temporary | wc -l` -eq 1 ]
client_global_setting # [   11.392934] dhcpcd[1110]: ens3: adding default route via 10.0.2.2
client_defaults # Device "eth1" does not exist.
08:17:49
@k900:0upti.meK900* IPv6 test seems to be failing because something changed about interface names?08:17:54
@k900:0upti.meK900 I wonder if misc is broken by the nspawn change 08:20:11
@k900:0upti.meK900 If it's trying to read /proc/cmdline 08:20:16
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaens vs eth12:03:42
@k900:0upti.meK900Maybe it was racing the rename or something12:04:01
@k900:0upti.meK900And now it wins12:04:02
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa

virtio_net virtio6 ens9: renamed from eth1

12:04:14
@me:m4rc3l.deMarcel joined the room.12:06:29
@elisaado:elisaado.comEli Saado wew I've literally had this issue yesterday 12:38:15
@elisaado:elisaado.comEli Saado you can use udevadm test-builtin net_setup_link /sys/class/net/ens18 to debug if you have an interactive shell I guess 12:38:55
@famfo:ccc.acfamfo joined the room.14:49:06
@limwa:matrix.orgAndré Lima Fix for nixosTests.misc: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/521677 19:25:16
@limwa:matrix.orgAndré Lima Also, regarding the nixosTests.installer.simple test, I'm seeing that the installer can't resolve DNS queries. Is this normal/intended? 21:03:49
@k900:0upti.meK900Yes21:04:37
@k900:0upti.meK900The installer runs fully offline21:04:41
@k900:0upti.meK900The idea is that everything required for the base install is on the image already21:04:50

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6