| 6 May 2026 |
 Yureka (she/her) | The last time I investigated it was slop accepted by upstream: https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/33015 | 08:25:45 |
| Yureka (she/her) | that was a build failure though, not a test failure | 08:26:18 |
| Yureka (she/her) | but we may need to downgrade our expectations and test more thoroughly before upgrading | 08:26:45 |
 vcunat | Quite a few newly-failing jobs on darwin, but nothing terrible, I think:
https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1825120#tabs-now-fail | 12:49:02 |
| vcunat | I expect that we start new staging-next roughly in 24h. | 13:02:47 |
| vcunat | I'm warming up darwin stdenvs already. | 13:03:16 |
| vcunat | Release schedule says that we merge in 5 days from now. That's certainly not happening. /cc yaya just in case you assumed that we follow it 😅 | 13:04:48 |
| vcunat | Normally it takes two weeks. | 13:05:22 |
 leona | in very good cases 1.5 weeks | 13:05:35 |
 hexa | good cases imply people care about issues early :p | 13:06:05 |
| vcunat | Often people try to squeeze as much changes as possible at the last moment, so... we'll see 😅 | 13:06:36 |
| leona | i'll try more this cycle (I currently also have more time), but will see :D | 13:06:37 |
 yaya | yeah I was about to ask about the status of starting the cycle ^^ | 13:11:19 |
| vcunat | I pinged the gnome 50 PR, as it has nontrivial upgrades and even though there is DE exception, we don't need to overuse it unless necessary. | 13:12:57 |
| hexa | yeah, that has me a bit worried | 13:17:09 |
| vcunat | I think it looked similar in the past few releases, at least at a very superficial glance. | 13:20:06 |
| vcunat | * I think it looked similar during the past few releases, at least at a very superficial glance. | 13:20:13 |
| 7 May 2026 |
 winston | RE the gnome 50 PR, I worked on it early on in March. now that it's merged, I guess we have a week-ish to settle on how we'll make the gdm nixos module work?
IIRC the problem was just that gdm wasn't running with the correct user, the rest of the PR looked good in a VM | 14:04:27 |
 emily | it was something to do with systemd-userdbd, right? maybe https://matrix.to/#/!SsuQHVzf59iBgk6YIm:0upti.me?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=tchncs.de can be of assistance (though I agree with https://matrix.to/#/!CTCrFzsBPYmDLmrja4:0upti.me/$2U9w2iyhK1hrYALIqmpThd3tsjENevltL9-NC5SPnjk?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=tchncs.de that the seeming partial collapse of GNOME maintenance is concerning going forward) | 14:11:46 |
| vcunat | I suppose it's a gamble. The time to merge to master would normally be about two weeks at this point. | 14:12:47 |
| winston | yeah, and for 51 there'll be even more of a dependency on it
https://blogs.gnome.org/adrianvovk/2025/06/10/gnome-systemd-dependencies/ | 14:13:33 |
| winston | there's already an issue for it https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/458058
it wasn't addressed during 49 as well, it was just worked around with fixed user ids | 14:13:54 |
| emily | I know ElvishJerricco has thoughts on userdbd for NixOS | 14:14:24 |
| emily | though AIUI userdbd is meant to be able to pick up records from /etc/passwd still? | 14:14:41 |
| emily | so I don't think it should require full integration? | 14:14:45 |
| winston | thanks for the nixos systemd channel, I'll see if I can get it to work
idk much about the whole stack atm sadly | 14:15:05 |
| emily | I assume it's been tried to just enable the NixOS option for userdbd in the GNOME module and that didn't work? | 14:15:21 |
| winston | I'd be interested in helping with GNOME I just kinda burned out on that PR after the LLM stuff | 14:15:27 |
| emily | "Tested with systemd 257.9 and #205121 but it always failed on various PAM issues." ok :) | 14:15:36 |
| emily | systemd room should be able to help | 14:15:45 |
