| 15 Sep 2021 |
 trofi | WDYT of something like https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/138052 | 20:37:27 |
| trofi | It's inspired by guix's rules (there staging is called core-updates) and gives nice initial impression of what goes where: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html | 20:38:55 |
| 16 Sep 2021 |
 hexa | let's all remember that the next staging-next run is reserved for systemd 249 | 03:18:12 |
 Sandro | So we skip another python unstable or what does this mean exactly? | 04:39:26 |
 Vladimír Čunát | One python dependency of all NixOS tests is broken in staging, by the way. | 07:49:42 |
| trofi | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/137617 should fix it | 09:14:13 |
| trofi | * https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/137799 should fix it (amended link) | 09:14:48 |
| Sandro | cachix: CppStdException "Exception: path '/nix/store/q1lx81pcqj3030rv1hwyifixjh9cp5c7-python3.9-sh-1.14.2' is not valid; type: nix::InvalidPath"
| 09:35:43 |
| Sandro | Not sure what causes this | 09:35:57 |
 asbachb | Finally my bottles changes are in staging-next :D | 18:44:21 |
| 17 Sep 2021 |
| Vladimír Čunát | staging-next is contained in master now. | 07:02:03 |
| hexa | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
let's all remember that the next staging-next run is reserved for systemd 249 I missed that systemd was rebased and merged into staging | 11:40:28 |
 lukegb (he/him) | so... does that me we can start the next staging-next cycle? | 11:56:20 |
| hexa | I believe so. | 12:12:13 |
| hexa | would you like to? | 12:12:18 |
| lukegb (he/him) | What's the process? Merge staging into staging-next and open a PR? | 12:15:09 |
| lukegb (he/him) | Oh, it's just a FF anyway | 12:15:41 |
| lukegb (he/him) | or not | 12:19:14 |
| hexa | yep | 12:20:43 |
| lukegb (he/him) | Oh, I should've merged the opencv fix into staging first | 12:20:52 |
| lukegb (he/him) | (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/138237) | 12:21:12 |
| hexa | i guess you still can | 12:21:23 |
| lukegb (he/him) | it's always fun seeing whatever random package stdenv rebuild steps actually end up attributed to | 19:16:06 |
| lukegb (he/him) | this week, it's ssb-patchwork (for x86_64-linux) https://hydra.nixos.org/build/153417098 | 19:16:17 |
| 20 Sep 2021 |
| hexa | this staging-next run is really uneventful, we need more like these :) | 12:32:45 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Yes, though I can still see a couple thousand build regressions: https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1706256?compare=trunk | 13:02:23 |
| trofi | nix-review-tools says at least on linux most failures are around qtwayland and hardened_kernel. | 13:24:16 |
| hexa | https://shells.darmstadt.ccc.de/~hexa/1706256.html | 16:30:40 |
| hexa | I'm going to take a look at the python stuff when I come back from the supermarket | 16:31:12 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Most of regressions seem to be darwin and linux-hardened. | 16:47:52 |
