!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

379 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/125 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
4 May 2026
@k900:0upti.meK900staging-25.11 seems to be mostly done17:44:59
@k900:0upti.meK900Are we doing master next?17:45:03
@k900:0upti.meK900I'm trying to thonk17:45:28
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátIt's certainly not ready to merge today.17:46:49
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátAfter a restart-all-failed round, maybe.17:47:19
@k900:0upti.meK900There's a TON of security17:47:35
@k900:0upti.meK900That someone needs to go through17:47:45
@k900:0upti.meK900Ideally that someone won't be me17:47:48
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát You mean before staging-next gets started? 17:48:31
@k900:0upti.meK900Yeah17:50:26
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát cups rebuilds darwin stdenvs (which take about one day themselves), so that's certainly a thing to get early: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/514379 17:50:33
5 May 2026
@leona:leona.isleonaas because of the nix cve, all nixos tests need to get rebuilded in 25.11 and nixos-unstable is nearly finished, I think it would be a good idea to merge staging-next-25.11. other opinions?17:10:19
@leona:leona.isleonathen we at least save one nixos test rebuild cycle17:10:44
@leona:leona.isleonaoh, wait. i'm wrong (as I found out with the other message). nixos-unstable was cancelled. ignore my other message then ig17:23:54
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátNo, you're right.17:25:42
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI was thinking the same.17:25:46
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát nixos-unstable is independent of 25.11 17:25:53
@hexa:lossy.networkhexait's remaining builds were cancelled but since the tested set was complete it advanced17:34:32
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa3 hours ago apparently17:34:41
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahttps://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixos/unstable/tested#tabs-constituents or not?17:35:03
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahuh no17:35:42
@hexa:lossy.networkhexait did not17:35:45
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa vcunat what was your idea with the cancellation again? 17:35:53
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátIt did advance.17:36:21
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI checked in git.17:36:30
@hexa:lossy.networkhexait does that with tested jobs cancelled?!17:36:55
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát It doesn't check the constituent jobs, just the tested job. 17:37:15
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawow17:37:35
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátUnfortunately Hydra is able to succeed the full thing before marking the individual jobs as succeded, but those builds did pass, of course. 17:37:45
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI thought tested depended on its constitutents17:37:53

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6