Robotnix | 261 Members | |
| Build Android (AOSP) using Nix | https://github.com/danielfullmer/robotnix | 83 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Mar 2024 | ||
| Though if you can, I'd prefer simply only including them optionally depending on the android version | 01:31:46 | |
| The first thing I'm trying to do, is to get it to build by specifying the allow insecure envvar. Then I can check which ones I can bump to python2 | 08:17:49 | |
| * The first thing I'm trying to do, is to get it to build by specifying the allow insecure envvar. Then I can check which ones I can bump to python3 | 08:17:54 | |
| The current issue is the clang thing | 08:18:04 | |
| But I bumped the entire flake.lock, I don't think that's ideal. @Atemu is there a good reason for unstable and 21.11 pin? Couldn't it just be 21.11 or something? | 08:44:04 | |
| Or just be unstable. Not sure which is better. | 08:44:12 | |
| Nono other than that I haven't been able to make them work | 10:40:55 | |
| Fair :D | 10:55:55 | |
| It seems like lineage needs the same treatment as grapheneos after bumping to 23.11, as shown here https://github.com/nix-community/robotnix/blob/c54c511b3aa3e827e7ae320d604646a0ecc7c96c/flavors/grapheneos/kernel.nix#L25-L36 , I've just initially tested it by adding
To the | 12:37:36 | |
| Feel broken, mostly because I'm not sure what I am even doing. Atemu is lineageos using a prebuilt kernel, and the vanilla and grapheneos is not? Ie. they are built using robotnix? | 12:54:13 | |
| 13:03:13 | |
| Fun, now it just fails further about libncurses.so.5 complaints. Not sure what changed in nixpkgs, that warrants these errors all of the sudden | 13:03:36 | |
In reply to @eyjhb:eyjhb.dkI think so yes | 15:07:10 | |
| Ah no, nvm I remember: It has kernel sources that are built during the android build | 15:07:36 | |