| 10 Mar 2026 |
 magic_rb | but we dont live in that world, as such it is morally acceptable for me to enforce AGPLv3 for my projects so that they can't be profited of. Either everyone plays by the rules of no copyright or im not playing either | 16:43:22 |
 jaen | Fair I suppose? Before it gets further off the rails, just one remark that my understanding is according to this interpretation they can't really profit off such code, because it's not theirs to begin with, because without the transformative element it defaults to public domain. Of course another question is enforcing that by suing and winning, but it's the same problem with GPL in principle? | 16:46:04 |
| magic_rb | yeah i guess we agree mostly, and yes, not the right room for this at all, i just cant help myself. I have a very strong opinion on this issue | 16:47:38 |
| jaen | Yeah. We probably don't agree at the core (I don't really hate models), but we probably agree on hating people using them to the detriment of society at large. And it's understandable how a person with human feelings and empathy can get angry at that. Anyway, peace & out on this end | 16:51:54 |
| magic_rb | last remark:
(I don't really hate models)
if someone presents me a model which was trained only on code which is either all permissive or if GPL then produces GPL code, id consider it. ofc then the question of elecricity cost and training cost comes along and the fact that such a model would be incredibly useless. currently the tech fundamentally relies on theft to function
| 16:54:28 |
| magic_rb | * last remark:
(I don't really hate models)
if someone presents me a model which was trained only on code which is either all permissive or if GPL then produces GPL code, id consider it. ofc then the question of elecricity cost and training cost comes along and the fact that such a model would be incredibly useless. currently the tech fundamentally relies on theft to function | 16:54:33 |
| 12 Mar 2026 |
|  crstl changed their profile picture. | 18:02:38 |
