| 26 Mar 2024 |
 atemu12 | If a project with different CLI interface is used, that part would have to be updated, yes | 10:37:46 |
 ajs124 | In reply to @eyjhb:eyjhb.dk
Wait, do you actually use OTA updates from your server to your phone? With signing and everything Atemu ? I used to have a setup like that | 10:38:04 |
| atemu12 | We need a new/different ota_from_target_files | 10:38:08 |
| atemu12 | o/ ajs124 | 10:38:22 |
| ajs124 | it was this https://github.com/ajs124/robotnix-hydra and some nixos config.
but I had to reformat my device at some point (forgot how to unlock it and didn't have it written down anywhere), so I switched to regular grapheneos. | 10:40:04 |
 eyJhb | In reply to @atemu12:matrix.org
We need a new/different ota_from_target_files Is the current one just pinned? I thought it just followed the "general" updates. | 10:42:03 |
| eyJhb | In reply to @ajs124:ajs124.de
it was this https://github.com/ajs124/robotnix-hydra and some nixos config.
but I had to reformat my device at some point (forgot how to unlock it and didn't have it written down anywhere), so I switched to regular grapheneos. Oh looks cool :D | 10:42:10 |
| eyJhb | But doesn't sound nice with not having the key. | 10:42:21 |
| eyJhb | I've never tried to run Hydra before. Or anytthing the like | 10:42:47 |
| atemu12 | Hm, interesting I don't actually know where it comes from | 10:43:27 |
| atemu12 | Though I do remember we used some 3rd party tool | 10:43:47 |
| atemu12 | And there was some super weird drama around it and it was eventually made unfree or something? | 10:44:06 |
| atemu12 | Android people... are weird | 10:44:11 |
| eyJhb | ajs124: https://github.com/ajs124/robotnix-hydra/blob/main/release.nix#L20 did more than just yourself use it? Or was it uploaded to that server for backups? | 10:45:18 |
| eyJhb | In reply to @atemu12:matrix.org
And there was some super weird drama around it and it was eventually made unfree or something? This drama? https://github.com/nix-community/robotnix/issues/137 | 10:45:41 |
| eyJhb | I seem to remember that this made it harder to make robotnix, or something. | 10:45:58 |
| atemu12 | Ah, it was the vendor scripts | 10:46:15 |
| atemu12 | Though those may have been the cause too | 10:46:26 |
| atemu12 | (Makes sense as anything related to HW such as the fingerprint is bound to be a blobby mess | 10:46:45 |
| atemu12 | * (Makes sense as anything related to HW such as the fingerprint is bound to be a blobby mess.) | 10:46:47 |
| eyJhb | https://github.com/GrapheneOS-Archive/android-prepare-vendor | 10:48:13 |
| eyJhb | Wait, did they take the project offline, and made it closed source? | 10:48:20 |
| eyJhb | It would be cool with grapheneos support for FP4. But doesn't seem like it will happen | 10:49:50 |
| atemu12 | It will explicitly not happen actually | 10:56:39 |
| atemu12 | FP4 secure boot is broken; they trust test-keys IIRC | 10:57:03 |
| atemu12 | Which is why I don't bother signing my images | 10:57:13 |
| eyJhb | Do you know if FP5 is equally broken? | 10:58:58 |
| atemu12 | Haven't heard anything regarding that | 10:59:32 |
| atemu12 | But it's such an obvious issue | 10:59:38 |
| atemu12 | Surely they must have fixed it... | 10:59:51 |
