| 26 Mar 2024 |
 atemu12 | Ah, it was the vendor scripts | 10:46:15 |
| atemu12 | Though those may have been the cause too | 10:46:26 |
| atemu12 | (Makes sense as anything related to HW such as the fingerprint is bound to be a blobby mess | 10:46:45 |
| atemu12 | * (Makes sense as anything related to HW such as the fingerprint is bound to be a blobby mess.) | 10:46:47 |
 eyJhb | https://github.com/GrapheneOS-Archive/android-prepare-vendor | 10:48:13 |
| eyJhb | Wait, did they take the project offline, and made it closed source? | 10:48:20 |
| eyJhb | It would be cool with grapheneos support for FP4. But doesn't seem like it will happen | 10:49:50 |
| atemu12 | It will explicitly not happen actually | 10:56:39 |
| atemu12 | FP4 secure boot is broken; they trust test-keys IIRC | 10:57:03 |
| atemu12 | Which is why I don't bother signing my images | 10:57:13 |
| eyJhb | Do you know if FP5 is equally broken? | 10:58:58 |
| atemu12 | Haven't heard anything regarding that | 10:59:32 |
| atemu12 | But it's such an obvious issue | 10:59:38 |
| atemu12 | Surely they must have fixed it... | 10:59:51 |
| eyJhb | But, GrapheneOS has also publicly stated, that they will not support FP, because it has binary blobs and a short security window at ... ehm.. whoever makes their chips | 11:00:52 |
| eyJhb | But I guess that might change with the FP5, as it will have.. 13 years of support? | 11:01:04 |
| eyJhb | OR 10? Dunno | 11:01:08 |
| atemu12 | 6 from the vendor IIRC | 11:01:16 |
| atemu12 | But they want to stretch it to 7 somehow | 11:01:29 |
| eyJhb | Isn't it more bacause of the IoT SoC? Or did that just go from 3 to 6? | 11:01:43 |
| atemu12 | Yup | 11:01:50 |
| eyJhb | Damn, I wanted more. But I guess it's on-par with pixel then | 11:02:06 |
 ajs124 | In reply to @eyjhb:eyjhb.dk
ajs124: https://github.com/ajs124/robotnix-hydra/blob/main/release.nix#L20 did more than just yourself use it? Or was it uploaded to that server for backups? was uploaded because it was the easiest way.
iirc at some point, 1-2 other people used it as well. | 11:02:14 |
| atemu12 | We'll see if Pixels actually get that | 11:02:19 |
| eyJhb | At least the publicly stated one | 11:02:19 |
| atemu12 | We're still talking about Google here | 11:02:26 |
| eyJhb | In reply to @atemu12:matrix.org
We'll see if Pixels actually get that Haven't they already proved that they get that? | 11:02:36 |
| eyJhb | They also updated some older devices recently I think | 11:02:45 |
| atemu12 | Who knows if the Pixel phone division exists in 3 years | 11:02:47 |
| eyJhb | True | 11:02:53 |
